Concern trolls be like
submitted 3 years ago by AntiLowEffortHuman from (i.imgur.com)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]AntiLowEffortHuman[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (2 children)
So what you're saying is real concern trolls never exist? What if I call it concern trollling AND address the argument?
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (1 child)
If you address somebody's argument you can do whatever you want with the rest. That's something people usually do not understand about fallacies, they exist in lieu of argument only. If I address your argument, and then call you a dumb fuck, it is not an "ad hominem". Nevertheless on this website that would be in violation of the website guideline against dragging down discussion.
[–]AntiLowEffortHuman[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
Due to the nature of saidit you can't downvote so you have to 'verbal downvote' which is just... addressing arguments at hand.
I still think that concern trolls are real and do try to derail discussion. Solution is If they gain enough traction just refute their argument so that anyone reading will not fall for them.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~4 users here now
view the rest of the comments →
[–]AntiLowEffortHuman[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (2 children)
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]AntiLowEffortHuman[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)