you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Our moms are not our enemies. There are no "designated free speech zones", as all areas are true free speech zones by default and by birth.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

The law disagrees.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I'm talking about an immutable law, not some flimsy dictate passed along by mere mortals. It's one of physics, really. Voices carry. Light travels. Thoughts resonate. Ideas are conveyed one way or another. There can never and will never be a limitation of who can or cannot speak their mind. Even when free speech seems suppressed, it's not. In the end, only the highest Authority can dictate such a thing.

Unless you are trying argue the other point. In which case: what, or who on earth do you consider not an enemy? :P

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Laws are made by men. There's no such thing as an immutable law.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Good, then change the law to say non-threatening moms can voice their concern without a permit! I feel like I'm trying to get through not just a mind, but a paycheck here.

edit: I see what's happening and it ends here. Good day to you sir or madam.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

...??? The hell do you think is happening here? You clearly think something was done wrong but permits and protest regulations have been in place nearly since day one. What, you want them abolished? Because women? What??

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Greetings ABlueSkilttle,

Another day.

Hell is exactly what I think is happening here. So many people are seeking true justice and have been voicing their concerns, yet another group is taking entirely too much pleasure in enforcing unjust laws. If the people can't form an impromptu redress of grievances, then why do we have a 1st Amendment at all? Must permission be granted from the very same people who may be acting in error and abusing their authority?

I've already said this, but: the right to free speech will never be suppressed. Not in any form. It's an absolute law of the universe, and can be found at all levels. An extreme attempt to deny this will most likely place you in a void with only yourself for company. There is however, always a way out, imo.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Illegal behavior, assault and property damage as on display here, is not "free speech".

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's ok man, it will all work itself out in the end.

Take it easy~