you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It looks like ridicule directed at me, then you go on replying to me about dust aggregation when I write there is no such thing as pure dust aggregation.

But no, I am not as well-read as you on the topic.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It looks like ridicule directed at me,

was the 'alien intelligence' part meant to be funny? thats what I loled at. you can continue to perpetuate the hard feelings even though I've said why i used 'lol', but that's not productive. Maybe just answer the question. Was it supposed to be funny?

also, 'no such thing as pure dust aggregation' is fine. As I said, the theory of dust aggregation fails until you introduce vorticies. Alien Intelligences aside. Nothing else, no other theory, produces massive planets that fit solar system and kepler extra-solar observations.

Unless you can point me to a paper that shows otherwise?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Of course not. Once I wrote "it's never just dust aggregation" I thought it was amply clear where I stand?

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

obviously it wasn't clear, since you got upset at my response which I thought was appropriate to the clear statement you made about aliens....