all 33 comments

[–]Site_rly_sux 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Did you honestly believe this? Are you a moron?

You think they hit a 44 billion dollar (lol) valuation by banning the names of two presidents

[–]ShekelPa 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The goyim know too much, shut it down!

It is believable, countless instances of throttling have been observed.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh okay so you really do have the low IQ level required to believe the OP screenshot?

Wow.

So you think a 44 billion dollar social discuss company has banned the name of multiple presidents

Okay buddy

[–]jet199 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (29 children)

I remember when the left were against the WEF.

[–]Site_rly_sux 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (28 children)

Nobody cares, or has ever cared, from either side of the aisle.

Just qanon conspiritards discovered it in the last few years. Nobody else had a recent shift in opinion; only qtards

[–]jet199 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

I know you're a troll but for others reading who might be young and think your BS is true, left wing protest of Davos have been the norm since it started.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-davos-protest-idUSTRE50U1F320090131

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (21 children)

I think you can hardly ignore the context of the publishing date. As of the publishing date, the Great Financial Collapse is happening, and a protest organiser said this (from your link)

Florence Proton of ATTAC Suisse, one of the Geneva organizers, said it was important for outside voices to be heard in debates about how to resolve the crisis.

“The people meeting in Davos are the ones responsible for this economic crises that is becoming, and is now, global,” she told Reuters

The context of that article is: a growing global crisis.

Here's some info on that organisation

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_for_the_Taxation_of_Financial_Transactions_and_for_Citizens%27_Action

I disagree with your characterisation that this was an exclusively left wing protest, or was part of the "leftist" cause, or that the protestors were out there advancing exclusively left wing ideas.

Secondly I disagree with your characterisation, that this protest was par for the course of left wing politics in the past.

I also disagree with the conspiracy theory that there's anything specifically interesting about the WEF that makes it important to the nonexistent Illuminati. What happened to the Bilderberg Group or trilateral commission? Weren't they the qtard bogeymen groups? Did they just stop being interesting to you qtards?

Fourthly you're an idiot to believe the screenshot in the OP, and you're an idiot to assume that it speaks to leftism even if it was true.

So, nah, I think anyone can tell who is BS ing

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

I think you can hardly ignore the context of the publishing date.

I disagree with your characterisation that this was an exclusively left wing protest

Stop moving the goalpost dude, she was responding to you saying this:

Nobody cares, or has ever cared, from either side of the aisle.

Which was pretty well proven to be incorrect by her link. She caught you with your foot in your mouth again saying some dumb shit, just man up and cut your losses and quit wriggling around like a slimy reptile

So, nah, I think anyone can tell who is BS ing

Yeah u/jet199 pwned you pretty hard, the whole site recognizes your fallacy filled trash-tier debate tactics except for 2 other users, that I don't even need to name because everyone knows who I'm talking about.

[–]Site_rly_sux 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

everyone knows who I'm talking about

Actually a number of users are certain that we're all the same person. So not "everyone", actually there are some quite deranged people here

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You're the AI being poorly trained by grandpa dicknipples

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

That's true and you're right, and I will concede the point that "nobody ever cared". That was wrong for me to say and you're right to point it out.

I guess I would rephrase my original objection. I was wrong to say "nobody ever cared" but I do stand by these other bullet points,

  • I disagree that the anti-WEF protest we've been linked to so far, was an exclusively left wing thing.

  • I disagree that there was, at one point, an anti-WEF position in general leftist politics that somehow disappeared

  • I disagree that the screenshot's claim about twitter is real, or that, if it was, it speaks to leftist politics in general

  • I also strongly disagree with conspiracy theories about the WEF that are really the exact same theories which people used to say about Bilderberg, trilateral, the fake, imaginary elders of Zion, etc. If someone wants to make a new conspiracy about wef then they need to explain why the last conspiracy about Bilderberg was wrong.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

That's true and you're right, and I will concede the point that "nobody ever cared". That was wrong for me to say and you're right to point it out.

Wow, quite frankly I'm shocked, but thats progress I suppose

Well I can agree with you here

I disagree that the screenshot's claim about twitter is real, or that, if it was, it speaks to leftist politics in general

And I said as much in the comments. If they shadow-banned everyone who said Trump or Vaccine, how could the left vote for 'anyone but trump' or encourage everyone to get vaccinated, you'd have to be retarded to believe this, and the tweet contains no supporting evidence

I disagree that there was, at one point, an anti-WEF position in general leftist politics that somehow disappeared

Half agree, no its not been a major position of the mainstream left. But RFK Jr is pretty well known and running for president as a Democrat, and really hates the WEF, so to say this is non-existent among the left is not quite right either

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

running for president as a Democrat

Only because he is a coastal elite literally having literal Curb Your Enthusiasm dinner parties, and he couldn't look Cheryl's guests in the eye if he had to admit being a republican.

But he doesn't fool anyone

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

and he couldn't look Cheryl's guests in the eye if he had to admit being a republican.

But he doesn't fool anyone

Let me give a rundown of his political and legal career from wikipeida, and you tell me whether it sounds like a democrat or a republican

Kennedy endorsed and campaigned extensively for Vice President Al Gore during his 2000 presidential campaign, and openly opposed his friend Ralph Nader's Green Party presidential campaign. In the 2004 presidential election, Kennedy endorsed John Kerry, noting his strong environmental record.[164]

In late 2007, Kennedy and his sisters Kerry and Kathleen endorsed Hillary Clinton in the 2008 Democratic Party presidential primaries.[165] After the Democratic Convention, Kennedy campaigned for Obama across the country.[166] After the election, he was named as a front-runner for Obama's EPA administrator.[167]

In 1986, Kennedy won a landmark case against Remington Arms Trap and Skeet Gun Club in Stratford, Connecticut, that ended the practice of shooting lead shot into Long Island Sound.[30] Kennedy also filed federal lawsuits to close the Pelham Bay landfill and the New York Athletic clubs, arguing that those facilities were interfering with public use of Long Island Sound.[31] On the Hudson, Kennedy brought a series of lawsuits against municipalities, including New York City, to properly treat sewage, and against industries, including Consolidated Edison, General Electric and Exxon, to stop discharging pollution and to clean up legacy contamination.[32]

Kennedy and his students also sued dozens of municipal waste-water treatment plants to force compliance with the Clean Water Act.[36] In 2010, a Pace lawsuit forced ExxonMobil to clean up tens of millions of gallons of oil from legacy refinery spills in Newtown Creek in Brooklyn, New York.[39]

On April 11, 2001, Men's Journal recognized Kennedy with its "Heroes" Award for his creation of the Pace Environmental Litigation Clinic.[40] Kennedy and his Pace Environmental Litigation Clinic received other awards for successful legal work cleaning up the environment.

Kennedy & Madonna is profiled in the 2010 HBO documentary Mann v. Ford[61] that chronicles four years of litigation brought by the firm on behalf of the Ramapough Mountain Indian Tribe against the Ford Motor Company over the dumping of toxic waste on tribal lands in northern New Jersey.[62] In addition to a monetary settlement for the tribe, the lawsuit contributed to the community's land being re-listed on the federal Superfund list, the first time in the nation's history that a de-listed site was re-listed

2007 Kennedy was one of three finalists nominated as "Trial Lawyer of the Year" by Public Justice for his role in the $396 million jury verdict against DuPont for contamination from its Spelter, West Virginia zinc plant.[64]

In 2017, the firm was part of the trial team that secured a $670 million settlement on behalf of over 3,000 residents from Ohio and West Virginia whose drinking water was contaminated with the toxic chemical, C8, which was released into the environment by DuPont in Parkersburg, West Virginia.[65]

In 2016, Kennedy became counsel to the Morgan & Morgan law firm.[66] The partnership arose from the two firms' successful collaboration on the case against SoCalGas Company following the Aliso Canyon gas leak in California.

In 2017, Kennedy and his partners sued Monsanto in federal court in San Francisco, on behalf of plaintiffs seeking to recover damages for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, that, the plaintiffs allege, were a result of exposure to Monsanto's glyphosate-based herbicide, Roundup. Kennedy and his team also filed a class action lawsuit against Monsanto for failing to warn consumers about the dangers allegedly posed by exposure to Roundup.

Minority and poor communities In his first case as an environmental attorney, Kennedy represented the NAACP in a lawsuit against a proposal to build a garbage transfer station in a minority neighborhood in Ossining, New York.[79]

In 1987, he successfully sued Westchester County, New York, to reopen the Croton Point Park, which was heavily used primarily by poor and minority communities from the Bronx.[80] He then forced the reopening of the Pelham Bay Park in the Bronx, which New York City had closed to the public and converted to a police firing range.[24]

Kennedy has argued that poor communities shoulder the disproportionate burden of environmental pollution.[81] Speaking at the 2016 SXSW Eco environment conference in Austin, Texas, he said, "Polluters always choose the soft target of poverty", noting that Chicago's south side has the highest concentration of toxic waste dumps in America.[82] Furthermore, he added that 80 percent of "uncontrolled toxic waste dumps" can be found in black neighborhoods, with the largest site in the United States being in Emelle, Alabama, which is 90 percent black.[83]

International and indigenous rights Starting in 1985, Kennedy helped develop the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)'s international program for environmental, energy, and human rights, traveling to Canada and Latin America to assist indigenous tribes in protecting their homelands and opposing large-scale energy and extractive projects in remote wilderness areas

From 1993 to 1999, Kennedy worked with five Vancouver Island Indian tribes in their campaign to end industrial logging by MacMillan Bloedel in Clayoquot Sound, British Columbia.[89]

In 1993, Kennedy and NRDC, working with the indigenous rights organization Cultural Survival, clashed with other American environmental groups in a dispute about the rights of Indians to govern their own lands in the Oriente region of Ecuador.[87] Kennedy represented the CONFENIAE, a confederation of Indian peoples, in negotiation with the American oil company Conoco to limit oil development in Ecuadorian Amazon and, at the same time, obtain benefits from resource extraction for Amazonian tribes.[87] Kennedy was a vocal critic of Texaco for its previous record for polluting the Ecuadoran Amazon.[88]

Oil, gas, and pipelines Kennedy has been an advocate for a global transition away from fossil fuels toward renewable energy.[109][110] He has been particularly critical of the oil industry. He began his career at Riverkeeper during the time that the organization discovered that Exxon was using its oil tankers in order to steal fresh water from the Hudson River for use in its Aruba refinery and to sell to Caribbean Islands. Riverkeeper won a $2 million settlement against Exxon and lobbied successfully for a state law outlawing the practice.[111] In one of his first environmental cases, Kennedy filed a lawsuit against Mobil Oil for polluting the Hudson.[112]

He accused Charles and David Koch, the owners of Koch Industries, Inc., the nation's largest privately owned oil company, of subverting democracy and for "making themselves billionaires by impoverishing the rest of us".[151] Kennedy has spoken of the Koch Brothers as leading "the apocalyptical forces of Ignorance and Greed".[152]

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

By definition. Once a person has a mental break. Then it doesn't really matter what you can find in their history or how many Wikipedia paragraphs you can paste at me. Because he had his mental break and became a MAGA antivax Qanon adjacent fauci virtue signaller, it's very clear to everyone where he stands politically

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Here, here is John Stuart Mill arguing against vaccine mandates, this is a CLASSIC LIBERAL POSITION, you have heard of John Stuart Mill right?

Wikipedia says: "One of the most influential thinkers in the history of classical liberalism, he contributed widely to social theory, political theory, and political economy."

https://brownstone.org/articles/john-stuart-mill-on-contagious-diseases-and-the-law/

Your hyper-partisan nonsense is not very well informed on the history of liberal theory.

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

First of all John Stuart Mill never claimed to offer the last word on any ethical question, only an approach for finding it.

Secondly, I wouldn't look to him for guidance on nuclear safety or data privacy and I don't look to him for guidance on modern medical ethics either

[–]Musky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah I was wrong and careless when I said "nobody has ever cared" about the WEF.

I read your link and read more about the S11 protest, and I do personally have some memory of the anti-globalism within the radical left in those years (although not in Melbourne obviously) so I agree I was wrong in my earlier comments.

I think you would find many people who would now today identify as right wing "groiper" types within the 2000 Melbourne S11 crowd.

I think probably the year 2000's anti-globalist banner attracted a lot of people opposed to NAFTA precisely because of right-wing racism, McVeigh militia ideas, anti-Clinton-ism rather than mainstream leftist stances.

[–]Oyveygoyim[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You obviously care since you've left multiple comments already. Are they at least paying you to post? I doubt it...you're just a good goy.

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What did you see "the left" do, which led you to believe that they went from being against, to no longer being against, the WEF?

The reason for me replying to you, is because I'm quite fascinated by the question in the previous paragraph. Obviously the answer in reality is absolutely nothing, but your brain has substituted a more preferable reality which aligns to your biases. So I'm quite interested what answer you'll have to the question

[–]Oyveygoyim[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I never once thought the Democrats were against the WEF. They've always supported the same shit. Jews, mass immigration, homosexuality, the myth of white supremacy, communism, etc.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oyveygoyim is a pedophile who jerks off to Bacha Bazi.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You'd have me believe they were banning all the liberals who ranted and raved about Trump? Or demanded people get vaccinated? I can see them doing that with 'Epstein' or "World Economic Forum" as there isn't any context they want people talking about that, but I would suspect that they are able to take context into account, as a keyword list like this would not work very well for some of these supposed banned words.

Matt Wallace seems to be playing fast and loose with his definitions here and egregiously misleading you about the simplicity of this process, there is simply no way they shadowbanned for the words 'trump' or 'vaccines' alone without context, or all the liberals would have been banned too. It is simply inconceivable that it operated as Wallace is implying

[–]BISH 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Ganon???

A Legend Of Zelda conspiracy? Jk.