you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]YouBowIPiss 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

Well assorted. White supremacist starter kit. Jews's hate is real,we must hate back as severe as they do.

[–]ReeferMadness 16 insightful - 3 fun16 insightful - 2 fun17 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

This is propaganda. There is nothing white supremacist about pointing out anti white racism. There is nothing hateful about it either. You don't need to hate jews to be against racism.

[–]goatmeal 12 insightful - 6 fun12 insightful - 5 fun13 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

didn't you hear? not hating yourself is white supremacist.

[–]AFutureConcern 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

This is true if you think "white supremacy" means "the belief, theory, or doctrine that white people are inherently superior to people from all other racial and ethnic groups, especially Black people, and are therefore rightfully the dominant group in any society," as it says in the dictionary.

In actual practice in the media, though, "white supremacy" means "the belief, theory or doctrine that white people deserve to exist and stand up for their own interests, and explicit discrimination and hatred toward whites should be discouraged." By this definition, the above imgur album is clearly "white supremacy".

The reason that the left has come to term such reasonable beliefs as "white supremacy" is because they have essentially figured out that the right was correct - in a fair, meritocratic, Western system, it's highly probable that blacks and other minority groups will do poorly. Rather than accept, though, that groups have different average abilities, the left decides the entire of society has to be rebuilt in a way that guarantees equal outcomes, which necessitates discriminating against whites. Anyone who opposes this clearly accepts to some degree the status quo, which is why standing up for white people is "white supremacy."

Now for a lot of classical liberals / centrists, this situation is confusing. It seems much like the "soft bigotry of low expectations" to expect blacks and other minorities to do poorly. Surely they must be the real racists! But to a leftist, as well as anyone willing to investigate uncomfortable facts, it's pretty dang obvious that we can expect blacks to score poorly on IQ tests, not show up to work on time, commit violent crime more often and so on. From the leftists' perspective, the view that all races are equal is purposely ignorant and self-serving. The real racism, in their view, is the very belief that high IQ, showing up to work on time, and not committing violent crime are positive traits in the first place. Hence they advocate for abolishing standardized tests, allowing flexible working hours, and freeing violent criminals from jail.

The reality is that we have to accept that groups are different and that we must expect whites to do better than blacks (on average) in the absence of discrimination. It's not enough to have blind faith in liberalism to "bring us equality," we have to accept that inequality between races is the natural (and desirable) result of a meritocratic system. Until we recognize that the anti-white left's observations about the under-performance of minority groups are not "racism", but a simple observation of fact (coupled with anti-white hatred and a misdiagnosis of the cause), we'll never defeat them.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You can also pity Jews for being utterly inferior to anything actually human. That's not hateful.

[–]soundsalad 11 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

White supremacist starter kit

Uh no. How is a collection of evidence showing that the media is anti-white, considered to be white supremacist? It's not.

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

No, you must love as Yeshua preached. That way we can create our own brotherhood in Christ and not have Jews subvert it so easily.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

THIS. This cannot be overstated.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

And if a Jew, such as Vanunu, who had accepted Christ and renounced his Jewishness and Nationalism, he would be grafted unto the tree of life. The man speaks the truth and is humble and meek despite the Israeli government calling him a homosexual, he's not and never was, to discredit him, or jailing him for the rest of his life for following Christ. For if he remained a Jew he would not have been treated as harshly, if at all.

My point is, if everyone followed Christ, in a country, that country would be perfect. Full of prosperity, love, humility and welfare. But the world hates Christ and so does not Israel.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

While I cannot speak about what is in the heart of this Vanunu, I wholeheartedly agree about the rest.

Christ IS the way, no matter whether he is adhered to by creed or via the scientific path. The latter is simply more adjusted to future human evolution, while the former is better suited to mentalities that emerged from the past into the present.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Reading this, I wonder... Have you ever heard of the Illustrated Man by Ray Bradbury? It's a collection of short stories, and one of the stories is about human astronauts finding life on an alien planet, only to be ignored by the natives because of a mysterious figure returning to them from their history.

You may enjoy it, although, few people seem to have the time to read fiction these days, and so I expect it will go unread. If you know that it will go unread, respond to this and I'll tell you the gist. Something about it has always nagged at me.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I probably read it already, 30+ years ago. I'm pretty sure I read all of Bradbury. But I may have a re-read.

On another note, I find it strange that nobody demonstrates the slightest curiosity as to the scientific path to Christ.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, in my limited experience, most people who say they follow Christ have this weird belief where miracles and God cannot be understood through any means whatsoever except through the Bible. They have this belief that science can only explain the "mundane" rather than being able to explain the "extraordinary" or "supernatural".

It doesn't seem crazy to me to think that if Christ were to do his miraculous acts with scientists recording everything about the act and the situation, then we would have a closer understanding of what's happening on a physical level. That just seems logical to me. If I mention this to my traditional family, they tend to scoff and say that God is unknowable, and that miracles are unexplainable.

It has long been something that has irked me.

You talk about a science of the mind, an exact science, and you speak of a scientific path to Christ. These truths feel very foreign to the modern man. I'm curious about it, but until I learned new words, I didn't even know what it was that I was curious about. It feels as though I have literally been living most of my life with my mind closed off to objective reality.