Some want Texas National Guard to be more violent towards migrants

submitted by Dune1032 from msn.com

all 14 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]twolanterns 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

violence is mandated if they resist arrest while/after committing their crime

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Violence would stop the whole problem of LOSING OUR NATION in this way, immediately. Violence is justified regardless of activity before and after arrest. Before, actually, would be better.

Bash a few thousand skulls in a day, and the next day those skulls will not be trying to cross the border illegally. "Refugee" status, my ass.

[–]chadwickofwv 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

When you are being invaded you shoot first and ask questions later.

[–]Dune1032[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not in this case. Tear gas should have been used when the crowd was cutting the concertina wire. The weapons the National Guard uses should depend on what weapons the migrants use. If they throw rocks, use rubber bullets. However, if the rocks are thrown with slings, they can be shot. The reason is the long range and lethality of slings. In fact, in the past slings were used as weapons to hurl stones.

[–]Dune1032[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

No. In this case, tear case would be sufficient.

[–]Dune1032[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I would like to add that Biden is stupid in doing nothing to stop the crisis at the Southern border and letting it become an issue that Trump can use.

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

dems plan to be sugardaddies to be voted for

expect further degredations in voting system attempted to facilitate that goal

[–]Dune1032[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But they risk being voted out of office. Biden should adopt the House's bipartisan border security plan. It would pass the House, since it is their plan.

[–]GuyWhite 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And more gibs to buy votes….more student loan forgiveness.

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Absolutely not. Mango Musolini and simp Repuglicans killed this: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/02/29/fact-sheet-impact-of-bipartisan-border-agreement-funding-on-border-operations/

[–]GuyWhite 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

“Fact sheet”. 🤣🤡

[–]dinkydinkus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No. In this case, tear case would be sufficient.

it is already too late, the united states has been invaded and all borders have been compromised.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If the USA started putting CEOs in prison for employing illegals, the problem would be solved in a week for $0

[–]dinkydinkus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If the USA started putting CEOs in prison for employing illegals, the problem would be solved in a week for $0

i just saw something on youtube that russia has vowed to take back alaska, because the sale of alaska was illegal.