you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

I disagree. This seems to refer to one conflict of interest. And this also seems to be a one sided political witch hunt.

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    There were 8 other Supreme Court justices that weighed in in that case, it’s ONE conflict if interest.

    You are COMPLETELY ignoring your sides corruption.

    You are bias, and untrustworthy.

    [–][deleted]  (4 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      These are all piss poor excuses and arguments.

      Like I highlighted in many comments. You suck at arguing.

      Right now, you are putting words into my mouth.

      I did not defend the black Supreme Court justice.

      I’m saying YOU DONT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT CORRUPTION.

      YOU ONLY CARE ABOUT YOUR SIDE WINNING.

      YOU ONLY CARE ABOUT ANOTHER SIDE LOOSING.

      You are a piece of shit. I don’t like you at all. Either your a total fucking moron, or your a fucking genius that knows exactly what they are doing.

      I’m giving you the benifit of the doubt and assuming you are a total fucking moron. A genius would make you 100% a piece of shit.

      Is this fucking socks?

      Are you fucking socks?

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        You are such a cunt.

        This is socks.

        Buddy, you are going to have to get better at this. You still suck. It took me like 5 replies to figure you out.

        This is not Reddit. None of us are going to take your shit.