Shocking Court Disclosure Shows Undercover Cops Urging Jan. 6 Protesters — Including Ashli Babbitt — To Enter Capitol Building ⋆

submitted by [deleted] from (thelibertydaily.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

few identifiable under-covers

Lol how did you identify Mike douchebag Sherwin as an undercover. Enlighten us. I would love to hear it

Undercover cop actions in the new videos were in context of the unarmed murdered Air Force Veteran

We don't know if Mike was an undercover cop but sure you're right about to enlighten us. Lol. Can't wait to hear it.

Also, what does "in the context of" mean here?

What does that actually mean?

Because the tweet shows one frame of video outside the capitol where Babbitt's coat is walking past. So what? What does that prove, other than two douchebag insurrectionists crossed paths during their crimes?

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I'm not sure who this Mike guy you are mentioning, but it seems you've not read the material....

Body-cam footage of three MPD bicycle officers, Tyquan Brown, Daniel Styles, and Christopher Vanacor, show them stopping a group of four people during the rally, who identified themselves with similar ID as being undercover officers. He suggested they hide their guns better.

MPD officer Terry Thorne 's body-cam shows him directing and urging people from the election concern rally, to the capital building.

MPD officer Lawrence Lazewski, who explained it was all a setup and that the police had some specific preparations.

MPD officer Anthony Alioto, who's body-cam caught officer Daniel Thau tasering people, tossing a bunch of qas into the crowds, and firing a 40-mm shell at protesters. It also caught Thau's use of pepper spray blowing back in their own faces.

Officer Luke Foskett’s body-cam shows some of the inside action and catches the Capitol Police supervisor saying, “You want to talk about getting caught with your pants down. We have no direction. Nobody can get on the [expletive] radio." And when asked how they how they could identify undercover operatives, he responded, "They will have a wristband. Their guns will have a candy stripe on the barrel.”

Officer Lazewski also spoke of how the police tear gassed themselves, saying "four platoons that are just gassed out."

And there was quite a bit more. The main holly-shit stuff was done by some other MPD officers referred to simply officer1, officer2, etc.

Also, what does "in the context of" mean here?What does that actually mean?

Because the tweet shows one frame of video outside the capitol where Babbitt's coat is walking past. So what? What does that prove

That was just one of several videos of undercover officers reacting to or interacting with Babbitt. The main one was the officers directing people to go into the building, "Go, go, go!’, physically pushed people through the door way inside, yelling, “C’mon, c’mon, c’mon, let’s go!” The officer wearing a Trump beanie and chanting "our house" made a comment about someone is going to get shot, before motioning towards Babbitt. They were recorded smiling, laughing and snickering after she did get murdered.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Mike is the person in the linked story we are discussing.

You can read the allegation against Mike here. The allegation is that, because he previously had a career somewhere in government, the whole thing must be an inside job.

https://mobile.twitter.com/FreeStateWill/status/1627000426863132677

Let's go through the lies you have told.

Because you told a whole bunch of them.

Here's the first one.

Body-cam footage of three MPD bicycle officers, Tyquan Brown, Daniel Styles, and Christopher Vanacor, show them stopping a group of four people during the rally

Not during the rally. This took place in DC surrounded by government buildings. You can watch it here.

https://mobile.twitter.com/FreeStateWill/status/1627062616597340163

You also lied when you said "similar ID" because the video just shows normal IDs.

You also lied when you said they identified themselves as undercover. They just said "law enforcement" as they stood in DC surrounded by government buildings

MPD officer Terry Thorne 's body-cam shows him directing and urging people from the election concern rally, to the capital building.

More lies. Why lie if your case is so strong?

Here's the video.

https://mobile.twitter.com/FreeStateWill/status/1627061678193127426

He's not directing them to any specific building. He's just instructing them to stay in the allocated protest area, to my ears.

I am happy to keep going when I have time later. But so far here's what you've shown me.

You've shown me some people in DC with government IDs and you've shown me protestors being told to stay in the protest area.

That was just one of several videos of undercover officers reacting to or interacting with Babbitt. The main one was the officers directing people to go into the building, "Go, go, go!’, physically pushed people through the door way inside, yelling, “C’mon, c’mon, c’mon, let’s go!” The officer wearing a Trump beanie and chanting "our house" made a comment about someone is going to get shot, before motioning towards Babbitt.

Link? I bet you're identifiably lying multiple times here but happy to review your links

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

We are talking about William Pope, the Jan6 defending who just got these new concerning videos to be made available to the public.

In this LibertyDaily post, they cite their source as Epoc Times and link to it in their article. It provides all the details as well as links to the videos. The court motion I linked details most of it too.

You seem to reject reality quite often.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Yeah, William's twitter thread.

Which is about people he calls "officer 1" and 2 which is really just douchebag Mike. Are you keeping up?

Are we just supposed to ignore all the lies you told above, and move on? And where's this video which proves Babbit was set up?

You seem to reject reality quite often

Why am I the one who has to stay on topic? Douchebag Mike. The court submission. Your lies. Stay on topic - you want to just lightly touch on these topics, so that nobody focuses long enough on the lies. So where's any proof about Mike and Babbit? Shall we just move on and change topics?

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Oh, so you are reading only twitter posts.... no wonder.

Read the court documents, don't waste your time on Twitter and hearsay.

No one said Babbit was setup; don't change the topic to strawman arguments.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This is not a link to any court documents. I am commenting on the link in the OP.

Don't tell me to go somewhere else - my comments are directed at the link in the OP. If you think there's some proof about douchebag Mike in any supplemental material then, go and find it, and summarise it to us. I am not going on a wild goose chase of various random court documents. Screw you for asking.

No one said Babbit was setup; don't change the topic to strawman arguments

Look at the fucking title of the thread you are commenting on you moron.

It quite clearly alleges that undercover cops urged Babbit to enter. What did we find in the evidence? We found that douchebag Mike caught a single frame of video, outside, with babbit's coat visible. So the title of this thread is a lie, you lied when you claimed "no one said" she "was setup".

So screw you again for being doubly moronic. Asshole

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I posted court documents, told you how to find better, sources and we had been talking about the entirety of those, not just a title.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ok I apologise, I see now that you linked some pdfs a few days ago.

Please now point to a page or paragraph you'd like to draw my attention to. What am I supposed to look for. I see that that exist and that you've linked them: but why? What am I looking ? Or just open the docs at random and see what I find? Is there some point you are making which is proven somewhere in those pdfs?