Shocking Court Disclosure Shows Undercover Cops Urging Jan. 6 Protesters — Including Ashli Babbitt — To Enter Capitol Building ⋆

submitted by [deleted] from (thelibertydaily.com)

all 32 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]zyxzevn 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

We already knew that from live broadcasts. It was a complete setup with some violent infiltrators (fbi and antifa).

[–]passionflounderIndependent 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Shocking? To whom?

[–]Questionable 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

For those who get their news from the main stream media. The same people who will never watch this video.

[–]1Icemonkey 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No shit man. It’s like the Capital Police sent out invitations.

[–]Canbot 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

They set her up, and shot her dead. The FBI and the capitol police literally conspired to commit first degree murder.

But who will prosecute the criminals when the criminals are in power?

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

How do you set someone up to climb a barricade like that?

Do you mean - by lying to her that the election was stolen, and by tricking her into thinking the president needed her in DC?

[–]1Icemonkey 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Are you one of the 81 million who voted for the most popular president ever? Kek.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am literally asking how "they set her up".

Do you know how "they" did it? Or what, exactly "they" did which could be termed "setting" her up.

Please share if so

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (22 children)

This is fake. It's a lie. You got lied to by this op again.

  1. It's not a "court disclosure". It's somebody's conspiracy theory. Not a disclosure.

  2. There's no mention of Babbitt in the original thread. Someone has added that to the story, for fake news purposes.

  3. It's not an admission. It's somebody's conspiracy theory. I will now relate the theory to you. There's this trumpist mayonnaise insurrectionist named Mike douchebag Sherwin, and Mike recorded himself doing various insurrection things. But Mike has a government job. So if Mike has a government job, ipso facto it's a conspiracy! Never mind the thousands of mayonnaise insurrectionists worked across the entire spectrum of careers: mike had some government job so it must'a been a conpiracy duh.

Ah whoopsy, for the twenty-eighth time this OP is caught presenting a false story again. Weird how sometimes he can read and critically work through an article, and other times he accidentally pastes absolute fake news engineered out of a conspiracy theory, to further radicalise insurrectionists. Whoopsy

[–]SoCo 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

The new videos evidence really does make the title's extreme seeming conclusion much more plausible. It seems a few identifiable under-covers were doing some sketchy stuff, but they could have just been on their own. The defendant, William Pope, loosely put the same speculation together in the court motion, when supporting reason why he should have access to some massive trove of body cams/CCTV's video evidence (in some DoJ web-portal). He first collected a ton of publicly released old video and used it to for his argument and also to attach to the motion some videos that the prosecutor, on multiple occasions, told him didn't exist. I especially liked motion response a couple months ago. It's super long, but quite entertaining about anywhere you jump in:

https://www.scribd.com/document/626809860/United-States-v-POPE-Response-to-the-Government-72#

Much of the video evidence is deemed 'sensitive material' and not publicly disclosed. He has a court "protective order" preventing him from disclosing certain stuff, probably the same boiler plate all the Jan 6 protesters got:

https://americangulag.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/dcd-1_2021-cr-00128-228003-00026.pdf

Undercover cop actions in the new videos were in context of the unarmed murdered Air Force Veteran, Ashli Babbitt. They were tweeted about here:

https://twitter.com/FreeStateWill/status/1626992939174973440

[–]iDontShift 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

there is plenty of evidence for a guy on a tower using a fucking bull horn directing people (absence from fbi lists)

we have a guy that removed the fence

we have the guy that directed traffic below the bull horn guy

NONE ON LISTS yet we have their faces, nobody cares about the guys that actually instrumental in removing the fence that said "DO NOT ENTER OR ELSE PERSECUTION"

THEY REMOVED THE FUCKING FENCE

then ushered them in

yeah, no time for stupid shit

God is all, praise the Lord and Celebrate Our Victory, for the Evil is Dumb

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

a guy on a tower using a fucking bull horn

So funny!

Try and find just ONE video from Jan 6th where insurrectionists AREN'T shouting slogans at each other. Just try and find one! So funny that you would grab to any weak nonsense as proof of your conspiracy.

So somebody removed a fence? An insurrectionist or a staff member? Is that your best proof? I swear to god it had better be staff. If your proof is that some insurrectionists moved the fence and shouted slogans then I will fear for your sanity.

By the way - why do you think these people are absent from FBI lists? How did you check that? I bet you're making it up for conspiracy points because it sounds nice. But let's see

[–]iDontShift 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

very specific, a guy in a tower. it was built for some stupid event they held there a month earlier (or something like that)

it was very unusual. nothing interests you tho.

MOVE ALONG, NOTHING TO SEE HERE

ok feds, we already saw you, it is too late

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Some dude climbed a tower and shouted conspiracy slogans at the insurrectionists.

Honestly that sounds like proof it wasn't an inside job if you ask me.

But you neglected to answer how you determined

  1. That Mike is an undercover. Don't just skip over this. It's the cornerstone of this whole thread

  2. That the people you claim aren't on an FBI lists are not on any such list. I hereby accuse you of pulling that out your ass so please provide a source

  3. Sure go ahead and link about this dumb tower or whatever. Just so we can debunk it together and after that, you must never cite it again

[–]iDontShift 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Honestly that sounds like proof it wasn't an inside job if you ask me.

lol, oh feds. you are pathetic group of 'people' more closely akin to a pack of dogs trying to run a computer

https://tatumreport.com/report-fbi-investigators-ignore-ray-epps-and-other-january-6-unindicted-operators/

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What a moronic link. You must be fucking brain damaged to read that and think it's legit. Here's their standard of proof

[The Fence Cutter] was described from the footage as “dispassionate, calm, and professional like he was just there to do a job.” This behavior directly conflicted with the emotions emanating from the January 6 crowd.

Wow so it must have been a conspiracy! Look at how relaxed someone described him appearing!

Seriously this shit is your standard or proof? And then you would, with no embarrassment, cite this to me as your proof?

And what's worse, this wasn't a doubt in your head, this was a true fact about the world, to you. You told me

there is plenty of evidence for a guy on a tower using a fucking bull horn directing people (absence from fbi lists)

we have a guy that removed the fence

we have the guy that directed traffic below the bull horn guy

NONE ON LISTS yet we have their faces, nobody cares about the guys that actually instrumental in removing the fence that said "DO NOT ENTER OR ELSE PERSECUTION"

THEY REMOVED THE FUCKING FENCE

You fucking child. You fucking brain dead idiot. You tried to tell me there was proof of a conspiracy but when it came down to it, your proof was "someone said he looked relaxed while doing it"

Are you fucking kidding me.

You should tell people. You should really say, up front, when engaging in internet arguments with non-brain damaged people - you should have made me aware upfront "hey by the way, I am going to sound like I believe this stuff and have it all proven, but really, I have no standards of proof and navigate fake information in a dream fugue state"

You fucking wasteman

[–]iDontShift 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

sup feds.

do you ever think to yourself.. "this is my life.. i spend it lying to others and with myself I am well pleased"

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

few identifiable under-covers

Lol how did you identify Mike douchebag Sherwin as an undercover. Enlighten us. I would love to hear it

Undercover cop actions in the new videos were in context of the unarmed murdered Air Force Veteran

We don't know if Mike was an undercover cop but sure you're right about to enlighten us. Lol. Can't wait to hear it.

Also, what does "in the context of" mean here?

What does that actually mean?

Because the tweet shows one frame of video outside the capitol where Babbitt's coat is walking past. So what? What does that prove, other than two douchebag insurrectionists crossed paths during their crimes?

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I'm not sure who this Mike guy you are mentioning, but it seems you've not read the material....

Body-cam footage of three MPD bicycle officers, Tyquan Brown, Daniel Styles, and Christopher Vanacor, show them stopping a group of four people during the rally, who identified themselves with similar ID as being undercover officers. He suggested they hide their guns better.

MPD officer Terry Thorne 's body-cam shows him directing and urging people from the election concern rally, to the capital building.

MPD officer Lawrence Lazewski, who explained it was all a setup and that the police had some specific preparations.

MPD officer Anthony Alioto, who's body-cam caught officer Daniel Thau tasering people, tossing a bunch of qas into the crowds, and firing a 40-mm shell at protesters. It also caught Thau's use of pepper spray blowing back in their own faces.

Officer Luke Foskett’s body-cam shows some of the inside action and catches the Capitol Police supervisor saying, “You want to talk about getting caught with your pants down. We have no direction. Nobody can get on the [expletive] radio." And when asked how they how they could identify undercover operatives, he responded, "They will have a wristband. Their guns will have a candy stripe on the barrel.”

Officer Lazewski also spoke of how the police tear gassed themselves, saying "four platoons that are just gassed out."

And there was quite a bit more. The main holly-shit stuff was done by some other MPD officers referred to simply officer1, officer2, etc.

Also, what does "in the context of" mean here?What does that actually mean?

Because the tweet shows one frame of video outside the capitol where Babbitt's coat is walking past. So what? What does that prove

That was just one of several videos of undercover officers reacting to or interacting with Babbitt. The main one was the officers directing people to go into the building, "Go, go, go!’, physically pushed people through the door way inside, yelling, “C’mon, c’mon, c’mon, let’s go!” The officer wearing a Trump beanie and chanting "our house" made a comment about someone is going to get shot, before motioning towards Babbitt. They were recorded smiling, laughing and snickering after she did get murdered.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Mike is the person in the linked story we are discussing.

You can read the allegation against Mike here. The allegation is that, because he previously had a career somewhere in government, the whole thing must be an inside job.

https://mobile.twitter.com/FreeStateWill/status/1627000426863132677

Let's go through the lies you have told.

Because you told a whole bunch of them.

Here's the first one.

Body-cam footage of three MPD bicycle officers, Tyquan Brown, Daniel Styles, and Christopher Vanacor, show them stopping a group of four people during the rally

Not during the rally. This took place in DC surrounded by government buildings. You can watch it here.

https://mobile.twitter.com/FreeStateWill/status/1627062616597340163

You also lied when you said "similar ID" because the video just shows normal IDs.

You also lied when you said they identified themselves as undercover. They just said "law enforcement" as they stood in DC surrounded by government buildings

MPD officer Terry Thorne 's body-cam shows him directing and urging people from the election concern rally, to the capital building.

More lies. Why lie if your case is so strong?

Here's the video.

https://mobile.twitter.com/FreeStateWill/status/1627061678193127426

He's not directing them to any specific building. He's just instructing them to stay in the allocated protest area, to my ears.

I am happy to keep going when I have time later. But so far here's what you've shown me.

You've shown me some people in DC with government IDs and you've shown me protestors being told to stay in the protest area.

That was just one of several videos of undercover officers reacting to or interacting with Babbitt. The main one was the officers directing people to go into the building, "Go, go, go!’, physically pushed people through the door way inside, yelling, “C’mon, c’mon, c’mon, let’s go!” The officer wearing a Trump beanie and chanting "our house" made a comment about someone is going to get shot, before motioning towards Babbitt.

Link? I bet you're identifiably lying multiple times here but happy to review your links

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

We are talking about William Pope, the Jan6 defending who just got these new concerning videos to be made available to the public.

In this LibertyDaily post, they cite their source as Epoc Times and link to it in their article. It provides all the details as well as links to the videos. The court motion I linked details most of it too.

You seem to reject reality quite often.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Yeah, William's twitter thread.

Which is about people he calls "officer 1" and 2 which is really just douchebag Mike. Are you keeping up?

Are we just supposed to ignore all the lies you told above, and move on? And where's this video which proves Babbit was set up?

You seem to reject reality quite often

Why am I the one who has to stay on topic? Douchebag Mike. The court submission. Your lies. Stay on topic - you want to just lightly touch on these topics, so that nobody focuses long enough on the lies. So where's any proof about Mike and Babbit? Shall we just move on and change topics?

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Oh, so you are reading only twitter posts.... no wonder.

Read the court documents, don't waste your time on Twitter and hearsay.

No one said Babbit was setup; don't change the topic to strawman arguments.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This is not a link to any court documents. I am commenting on the link in the OP.

Don't tell me to go somewhere else - my comments are directed at the link in the OP. If you think there's some proof about douchebag Mike in any supplemental material then, go and find it, and summarise it to us. I am not going on a wild goose chase of various random court documents. Screw you for asking.

No one said Babbit was setup; don't change the topic to strawman arguments

Look at the fucking title of the thread you are commenting on you moron.

It quite clearly alleges that undercover cops urged Babbit to enter. What did we find in the evidence? We found that douchebag Mike caught a single frame of video, outside, with babbit's coat visible. So the title of this thread is a lie, you lied when you claimed "no one said" she "was setup".

So screw you again for being doubly moronic. Asshole

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I posted court documents, told you how to find better, sources and we had been talking about the entirety of those, not just a title.

[–]iDontShift 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

ok roy epps

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think your brain-dead retarded conspiracy is about someone called "Ray" not "Roy".

Moron.

[–]iDontShift 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

nobody cares about getting the feds names right

fuck off fed. lol. what a fucking tool!

LOL

omg, think i just died a little thinking about how dumb you are

ok, gotta stop doing that.

do believe yourself? lol, what would that even mean? lol

[–]TaseAFeminist4Jesus 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Cuck

[–]bucetao6969 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

On Brazil's Brasilia attack there where also cops that didn't outright stop protesters, and led them where they wanted to go. But that was because the cops also supported the same cause of the protesters. It wasn't an inside job it was just a reading on the moment of "ok maybe we should let this go on".

[–]iDontShift 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

the real story

BREAKING: Tucker Carlson says the Jan 6 footage he has seen directly contradicts what we’ve been told.

In light of that, Mr. Carlson’s statements are “a statement on matters of public concern” that deserve the highest protection. source INTERESTING READ

npr says.. lol You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers