you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This is not a link to any court documents. I am commenting on the link in the OP.

Don't tell me to go somewhere else - my comments are directed at the link in the OP. If you think there's some proof about douchebag Mike in any supplemental material then, go and find it, and summarise it to us. I am not going on a wild goose chase of various random court documents. Screw you for asking.

No one said Babbit was setup; don't change the topic to strawman arguments

Look at the fucking title of the thread you are commenting on you moron.

It quite clearly alleges that undercover cops urged Babbit to enter. What did we find in the evidence? We found that douchebag Mike caught a single frame of video, outside, with babbit's coat visible. So the title of this thread is a lie, you lied when you claimed "no one said" she "was setup".

So screw you again for being doubly moronic. Asshole

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I posted court documents, told you how to find better, sources and we had been talking about the entirety of those, not just a title.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ok I apologise, I see now that you linked some pdfs a few days ago.

Please now point to a page or paragraph you'd like to draw my attention to. What am I supposed to look for. I see that that exist and that you've linked them: but why? What am I looking ? Or just open the docs at random and see what I find? Is there some point you are making which is proven somewhere in those pdfs?