all 9 comments

[–]IkeConn 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They don't want those pesky things called "facts" to get out.

[–]handbananasrevenge 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Democracy(TM) dies in darkness. But only certain kinds of darkness apparently.

[–]cm18 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They made it political. Fuck'em.

[–]chadwickofwv 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Their wording gives away their intent. They want to put him in prison, the facts don't matter.

I'm betting Paul Pelosi invited the guy over for a drug deal, gay sex, or both. Paul then, for whatever reason, attacked him, and he defended himself.

[–]TarBaby 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It was a failed CIA assassination plot.

[–]Alienhunter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Devil's advocate: They don't want security information to leak to discourage people from taking advantage of their (incompetent) security policies.

[–]Inspector_Monkfish 0 insightful - 1 fun0 insightful - 0 fun1 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well that part can be censored…..

[–]Alienhunter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

True, and so long as they don't the gay lover theory will find life.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

'as much as possible' Does that mean the fatter the brown envelope they get from Nans, the more they will limit public access?