you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Insider 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

The psyop is that America's the one engaging in the war, not China. Bush, Clinton and a bunch of other pedo controlled operatives in other countries gave tech and moved manufacturers to China. China didn't steal tech, it was GIVEN to them to build them up as the next enemy.

Transfer of missile tech: https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/missile/keystories.htm

https://web.archive.org/web/20180605180315/http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/crs/98-485.pdf

China: Possible Missile Technology Transfers from U.S. Satellite Export Policy

https://fas.org/nuke/guide/china/doctrine/dmrr_chinatech.htm

U.S. Commercial Technology Transfers to the People’s Republic of China

https://web.archive.org/web/20080603073300/http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=9231

US: Bush's Brother Has Contract to Help Chinese Chip Maker

https://thediplomat.com/2016/12/bush-gave-china-permanent-normal-trade-relations-status-with-the-us-15-years-ago-what-did-that-change/

Bush Gave China Permanent Normal Trade Relations Status With the US 15 Years Ago

See Canada:

https://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2015/09/30/selling-canada-out-one-deal-at-a-time.html

The Harper government gave Chinese investors “market access” to Canada — meaning a right to buy what they want in our economy — without getting the same for Canadian investors in China.

We know for sure Clinton's a pedo. Bush is a pedo faggot like most Republicans (see his male prostitute, Jeff Ganon). And Canada's Stephen Harper is associated with a bunch of pedos, one of which he pardoned (Graham James).

During the Obama era, the pedos were finishing up with the Middle East and set their sights on ruling the Asian Pacific to accomplish their NWO.

https://www.politico.com/story/2009/11/americas-first-pacific-president-029511

President Barack Obama billed himself Saturday as “America’s first Pacific president,” promising the nations of Asia “a new era of engagement with the world based on mutual interests and mutual respect.”

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/12/america-china-relationship/

The sixth and final priority was the strategy of “returning to the Asia Pacific,”

https://democraticac.de/?p=80609

Obama’s Strategy towards China – Containment Strategy

Government RAND think tank article (War with China Thinking Through the Unthinkable): https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR1100/RR1140/RAND_RR1140.pdf

We postulate that a war between the United States and China would be regional, conventional, and high-tech, and it would be waged mainly on and beneath the sea, in the air (with aircraft, drones, and missiles), in space, and in cyberspace. We also assume that China would not attack the U.S. homeland, except via cyberspace, given China’s minimal capability to do so with conventional weapons. In contrast, U.S. nonnuclear attacks against military targets in China could be extensive.

War would damage China much more than America.

In 2016, John Pilger released a documentary showing the US containing China with military and preparing for war during the Obama era:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3hbtM_NJ0s

China responded by building military bases in the South China Sea. Soros-controlled Trump continued Obama's foreign policy plans against China building up public hate against them and Biden continued building up military alliances like the Quad against the "China threat". China's been spending a shit ton of money to prevent this war from happening and the military industrial complex is slightly appeased by the Russia/Ukraine war now.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hi Socks. That is base propaganda and I am offended at its quality.

[–]Canbot 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You are claiming that every business dealing with China is a nefarious transfer of technology. That's stupid.

The only tech transfers that matter are the classified secrets.

Curiously you don't show how it was Israel who sold US secret weapons technology to China after aquireing it for thier own defense, likely through Jewish subversion within our own government.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How do you feel about China's relationship with Klaus Schwab and the WEF? Is the WEF threat the same as the China threat?

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The WEF if just a small part of the globalist threat. It is far greater than any threat from China.