Actual Insurrection: Chicago Mayor Urges 'Call To Arms' Over Supreme Court

submitted by Drewski from zerohedge.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Drewski[S] 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Counter point: While this language may be more incendiary than that used by Trump before the January 6 "insurrection", it is still protected First Amendment speech.

[–]monkeymagic 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

incorrect. riot incitement is not protected speech.

[–]Dunwidit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But it should be... The second you restrict any speech... It is no longer free speech. It's allowed speech. Freedom... True freedom... Requires tolerating things even if you don't agree with them. You can call for riots all day long. (What happened in 1776 was completely illegal, but totally lawful) these things need to sort themselves out... And you do what you agree with. Accepting personal responsibility for your actions or failures to act. If you want to call something a "freedom" but only in the ways that you agree with it... You're not talking about freedom anymore.