use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~3 users here now
It's All Politics
Inflation Bankrupting Americans but Biden Sends $13.6 billion to Ukraine
submitted 2 years ago by Rastafoo from cnbc.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (4 children)
Don't believe the GOP propaganda. There were numerous improvements in the voting rights bill that would have given everyone an equal opportunity to vote. The GOP didn't want that. Voter ID was still required.
Regarding the jobs bill, you are again noting GOP propaganda. They did reduce taxes and regulations, several years in a row, costing the US $10 trillion by the start of Jan 2021. The jobs bills have been for the 99%, not more money for those assholes who committed fraud in previous years. Did they hoard the money they were able to keep with the tax breaks and reduced regulations? Of course. That money was NOT reinvested.
Please read different sources of news, here: https://adfontesmedia.com/
[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
/u/RedEyeWarrior
AP News is the Least Biased Part 1
Multi-billionaire Zionist Jew Mortimer B. Zuckerman1 (photo right) and Simon Wiesenthal Center guest, rabbi Marvin Hier (photo left), urged Americans to take notice (speech act) of those celebrating 9/11. On that fateful day, Americans were to propagate the will of what the founder of modern propaganda, the Jew Edward Bernay’s, called the “invisible government.” The “organized habits and opinions of the masses” writes Bernay’s, are to be “manipulated,” their “minds molded,” their “ideas suggested largely by men [they] have never heard of.”
This, according to Bernays, is the benefit of having a “democratic” catachresis in which sociopaths “behind the scenes” control society. That is, the “will of the people,” as if possessed by some kind of dark spell, fronting the will of those “unseen” manipulators, particularly the Jewish mafia – the “Mishpucka” as they are often called. Hence, Americans on 9/11 were to support a senseless agenda, via the pretext of a threat, which these High-priests of finance and war manufactured either directly or were complicit in the act indirectly through payments or mutual understanding of the act that would benefit their ideology.
"Make no mistake about it, those people [Palestinians] who find joy amidst our suffering are the cheerleaders who keep international terrorism alive," rabbi Marvin Hier said in a release shortly after 9/11.
Likewise, Boston Properties Chairman Mortimer B. Zuckerman, of Russian-Jewish descent and Chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Organizations, “expressed shock at film he saw of Palestinian children dancing in the streets after hearing of the horrible attacks.”
"It brings home again” said Zuckerman, “that this is not an Arab-Israeli conflict. It is a conflict that has been widened to include Western civilization and culture [speech act].” Zuckerman continued; “[h]ow does an open and disputatious democracy2 deal with a ruthless group of radical Islamists with no known address, who are willing, even eager, to die in what they view as an existential struggle between the West and Islam? Every candidate will have to face the reality that terrorists may become armed with technologies that literally permit them to wage a world war. But what was America to do when it suffered more casualties on 9/11 than at Pearl Harbor? The Bush administration concluded that we had to go on the offensive, even to the point of pre-emption – to get them before they get us. Love-hate. The case for pre-emption is strong.” “It does not fit the normal lexicon of democratic polity, but the imminent threat today is not the imminent threat of yesterday, when armies massed at frontiers, advertising their hostile intentions. There will be no warning from those who hide in the dark, intent on inflicting death on thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands, irrespective of race, religion, or creed.”
"It brings home again” said Zuckerman, “that this is not an Arab-Israeli conflict. It is a conflict that has been widened to include Western civilization and culture [speech act].”
Zuckerman continued; “[h]ow does an open and disputatious democracy2 deal with a ruthless group of radical Islamists with no known address, who are willing, even eager, to die in what they view as an existential struggle between the West and Islam? Every candidate will have to face the reality that terrorists may become armed with technologies that literally permit them to wage a world war. But what was America to do when it suffered more casualties on 9/11 than at Pearl Harbor? The Bush administration concluded that we had to go on the offensive, even to the point of pre-emption – to get them before they get us. Love-hate. The case for pre-emption is strong.”
“It does not fit the normal lexicon of democratic polity, but the imminent threat today is not the imminent threat of yesterday, when armies massed at frontiers, advertising their hostile intentions. There will be no warning from those who hide in the dark, intent on inflicting death on thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands, irrespective of race, religion, or creed.”
As we shall see, Mortimer Zuckerman doesn’t want the “conflict” – engineered entirely by war profiteers, Israel’s Likud and sayanim3 – to be focused solely on Israel but widened to accompany Israeli foreign policy advisor Oded Yinon’s “Global War on Terror scheme.”4 Nothing but a total transformation in American foreign policy would satisfy Zuckerman’s blood lust for war. And notice too, Zuckerman’s curious choice of the words: “pre-emptive” warfare and “Pearl harbor.” Is it possible that Zuckerman read the Project for a New American Century’s Rebuilding America’s Defenses document, authored and signed prior to 9/11 by a legion of neoconservative Zionist Jews including rabbi Dov Zakheim,5 Donald Kagan (descendant of the Kaganovich Bolshevik tribe) and Trotskyist Jew William (Bill) Kristol? Or, is it possible that Zuckerman read the uncannily and prescient white paper entitled Catastrophic Terrorism: Elements of a National Policy, also authored prior to 9/11, by the likes of Zionist Jew Phillip Zelikow (who later directed the “set-up to fail” 9/11 commission and who presently directs the Covid-19 commission) and Zionist Jew John M. Deutch.6 As we shall see, both think tank papers cryptically glorify pre-emptive warfare and essentially wet-dream about a new pearl harbor!
We come to realize, however, that Zuckerman and rabbi Marvin Hier’s indignation is based on a monstrous myth. Not only was 9/11 orchestrated by a cabal in their supremacist tribe, but the very televised and published speech acts Zuckerman and Hier gave, enraged about these curious Palestinians “celebrating” the “collapse” of the Twin Towers on 9/11, was in actuality a staged event by Reuters and the Associated Press – “news” agencies, considered in the west, to be the least biased in the world.
Ten days after the 9/11 event, in a piece entitled Die Macht der TV-Bilder (The power of TV images), well-respected German paper Der Spiegel utterly exposed this pernicious anti-Palestinian propaganda.7 Likewise, German journalist Lisa Erdmann in her article What is the truth? did a careful investigation on the matter;
[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago* (2 children)
/u/RedEyedWarrior
AP News is the Least Biased Part 2
“Just hours after the attacks on New York and Washington, television stations around the world showed images of Palestinians cheering the incomprehensible act. Now it is said that some of these posted pictures are old.” “Children cheer … a woman with a black headscarf and glasses joyfully pulls up her arms, a man clapped and waved at other passers-by – [this was the scene of the “celebrating Palestinians” around the world.] A street scene filmed in Jerusalem on September 11, on the day of the attacks in New York and Washington. Pictures that went around the world. Images that shook many people. The hunger for information and footage was insatiable that day – so these recordings were also broadcast by the TV stations over and over again, accompanied by the words that these Palestinians would celebrate the attacks in the USA. But now, ten days after the attacks, the ARD political magazine Panorama reports that there may be another truth about these images, that the scene may even be set.” “The cheering Palestinians were filmed by two news agencies: Reuters and Associated Press (AP). Television viewers only got to see a few seconds of the footage last week. In total, however, the TV stations ran up about four minutes. Panorama editor Annette Krüger-Spitta took a closer look at the entire tapes of the two agencies. In doing so, she found discrepancies.” “The finished cut news films last week had given the impression that many people were celebrating on the street. There were no total shots showing the whole street, but only small groups of people. On the material supplied, however, there were indeed totals – they clearly showed that only a handful of Palestinians cheered, many others simply passed uninvolved. "The woman with the headscarf later said that she had cheered into the camera because she was promised cake," says Krüger-Spitta. The Palestinian woman said she was horrified when she saw the context in which her jubilation was shown. She abhors the deeds in New York and Washington. What is the truth?” “Already last week, excited mails swept around the globe about a similar case. CNN had used ten-year-old images to prove the alleged jubilation of the Palestinians. A Brazilian student, Marcio, posted a letter on Wednesday on the website of Indymedia, an independent media platform. He wrote that he had evidence that the images seen on the American news channel on September 11 were fake. The footage dates back to 1991 and shows celebrations of Palestinian youth after the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. One of his lecturers had compared video recordings from that time and them with the current reports. Conclusion: Both pictures are identical. CNN is creating a mood against the Palestinians.” “Just two days later, on Friday, Marcio rowed back. The information was only a presumption, the university teacher could not prove his suspicions. But by then it was already too late. To this day, e-mails with the misinformation haunt the net, to this day many editorial offices, including us, repeatedly receive worried hints from readers. CNN International has vehemently denied the accusation against SPIEGEL ONLINE. Reuters TV, which provided the material to CNN, also rushed to refute the allegations.”
“Just hours after the attacks on New York and Washington, television stations around the world showed images of Palestinians cheering the incomprehensible act. Now it is said that some of these posted pictures are old.”
“Children cheer … a woman with a black headscarf and glasses joyfully pulls up her arms, a man clapped and waved at other passers-by – [this was the scene of the “celebrating Palestinians” around the world.] A street scene filmed in Jerusalem on September 11, on the day of the attacks in New York and Washington. Pictures that went around the world. Images that shook many people. The hunger for information and footage was insatiable that day – so these recordings were also broadcast by the TV stations over and over again, accompanied by the words that these Palestinians would celebrate the attacks in the USA. But now, ten days after the attacks, the ARD political magazine Panorama reports that there may be another truth about these images, that the scene may even be set.”
“The cheering Palestinians were filmed by two news agencies: Reuters and Associated Press (AP). Television viewers only got to see a few seconds of the footage last week. In total, however, the TV stations ran up about four minutes. Panorama editor Annette Krüger-Spitta took a closer look at the entire tapes of the two agencies. In doing so, she found discrepancies.”
“The finished cut news films last week had given the impression that many people were celebrating on the street. There were no total shots showing the whole street, but only small groups of people. On the material supplied, however, there were indeed totals – they clearly showed that only a handful of Palestinians cheered, many others simply passed uninvolved. "The woman with the headscarf later said that she had cheered into the camera because she was promised cake," says Krüger-Spitta. The Palestinian woman said she was horrified when she saw the context in which her jubilation was shown. She abhors the deeds in New York and Washington. What is the truth?”
“Already last week, excited mails swept around the globe about a similar case. CNN had used ten-year-old images to prove the alleged jubilation of the Palestinians. A Brazilian student, Marcio, posted a letter on Wednesday on the website of Indymedia, an independent media platform. He wrote that he had evidence that the images seen on the American news channel on September 11 were fake. The footage dates back to 1991 and shows celebrations of Palestinian youth after the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. One of his lecturers had compared video recordings from that time and them with the current reports. Conclusion: Both pictures are identical. CNN is creating a mood against the Palestinians.”
“Just two days later, on Friday, Marcio rowed back. The information was only a presumption, the university teacher could not prove his suspicions. But by then it was already too late. To this day, e-mails with the misinformation haunt the net, to this day many editorial offices, including us, repeatedly receive worried hints from readers. CNN International has vehemently denied the accusation against SPIEGEL ONLINE. Reuters TV, which provided the material to CNN, also rushed to refute the allegations.”
“Palestinians, and by extension Muslims,” were dehumanized and portrayed as heartless, bloodthirsty animals. AP, the BBC, Fox, CNN, and many other corporate-Zionist controlled media outlets broadcasted these staged photos and videos on a global stage repeatedly. For the sweetness of cake, jubilant innocent Palestinians facing apartheid were told to cheer and celebrate in front of the camera for deceitful propaganda footage needed to paint a whole people as beasts for slaughter. The audacity to broadcast staged footage to an information-hungry world in the wake of the 9/11 attacks is inexcusable but indispensable for the drive required for a geopolitical culture shift that benefits Israel and the Zionist project. Multi-millionaire “comedian” Howard Stern (Zionist Jew), seeing the fraudulent footage, would call these Palestinian kids “bastard children” and advocated for the dropping of a nuclear bomb on Palestine on public radio. Stern’s statements were apparently satisfactory for public broadcast but god forbid one criticizes his murderous statements and you’re an “antisemite” who wants to “murder Jews.” Stern, unsurprisingly, is a fervent supporter of “vaccine” mandates for Americans and a persistent supporter of Israel, the same ethnostate caught injecting Palestinians and Ethiopian-Israeli women with the long-acting birth control drug Depo-Provera without their informed consent. Likewise, drug addict Stern has the audacity to criticize tennis player Novak Djokovic, a man in top physical shape, because he refused the covid-19 “vaccine” and was deported from Australia. For this view, Stern is lionized in the media, and when he supports a state that murders innocent people, calls for the murder of innocent “subhuman” Palestinians, and wants to mandate spike protein bioweapons on white people of European descent, then he’s the arbitrator of “truth.”
Endnotes
(1) Zuckerman was an ardent supporter of Obama and even helped to write one of President Barack Obama's political speeches.
(2) Not withstanding the fact that the US is not a “democracy” but a “republic.” Even so, both of these terms are nothing more than pseudo-lanaguge for a charter corporation. Hence, the US is, in essence, a corporation.
(3) Sayanim (Hebrew: סייענים) are Jews who live outside of Israel and often hold citizenships of countries they reside in, but who volunteer or are recruited clandestinely by Mossad to assist with their operations.
(4) “The 1980’s plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states, i.e. Balkenization. […] Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel’s satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimation. The Zionist plan for Iraq (as articulated in Oded Yinon's "Balkanization" paper) is to foment sectarian conflict in order to divide the country into smaller ethnic statelets that would be easy to control and exploit. Under Saddam Hussein's secular Ba'ath regime there was no conflict between the various ethnic or religious groups in Iraq. The ethnic tensions were created by false-flag terrorism.” (https://bollyn.com/)
(5) “Rabbi Zakheim who controlled the purse at the Pentagon at the time that trillions of dollars went unaccounted for wrote how his religion, Judaism, permits rape of non-Jewish women. No one cares about the rape of the taxpayers or his ‘ethics’ of the rape of women.”[…] Observing that Judaism is plagued with a “master race” ideology, Zakheim takes the Jewish aristocratic royal blood very serious. “Think about this; the head of the Rothschild empire and World Jewish Congress endorses a genealogy that makes [Zakhiem and Rothschild] family related to founder of communism Karl Marx, Freud, Heine, rebbe Schneerson, Heschel, Buber, Rashi, etc., etc. and the entire alt-media and conspiracy racket has nothing to say of it!” (http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-united-states-out-of-control.html/) (https://nitter.net/MauricePinay/status/1145066708236939271)
(6) Former Deputy Secretary of Defense from 1994-95, and Director of the CIA from 1995-96.
(7) http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,158625,00.html
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (1 child)
Thank you, Jesus, but I see no evidence here that would justify the slaughter and displacement of millions of innocent Ukrainians. If you don't like Jewish people in Ukraine, notice that Putin is making two members of the Jewish leadership heroes of Ukraine. Notice also how much money laundering and military support Russia shared with Israel and how Israel will NOT say anything that is critical of Putin's genocide of Ukrainians. Wo who are the Nazis? Israeli leadership and Russian leadership. Who suffered the most in WWII, in the cold war, in the 1986 Chernobyl meltdown, in the 1990s with disarmamant, and now with the slaughter of innocent civilians? This is at the hands of Putin and those who support him (inc. Israel, India, China, Syria &c). If you support war crimes in Ukraine, you also support those people.
[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
" If you don't like Jewish people in Ukraine," never said that. Jewish people have been living in the Pale of Settlement region for a thousand years.
notice that Putin is making two members of the Jewish leadership heroes of Ukraine. Notice also how much money laundering and military support Russia shared with Israel and how Israel will NOT say anything that is critical of Putin's genocide of Ukrainians.
Do you have a source for the first statement, and yes, I have noticed Israel's nuetrality but also Zelenskyy who claims Ukrainians are now like Israelis, and would do good to fight back the invading army.
Wo who are the Nazis? Israeli leadership and Russian leadership. Who suffered the most in WWII, in the cold war, in the 1986 Chernobyl meltdown, in the 1990s with disarmamant, and now with the slaughter of innocent civilians? This is at the hands of Putin and those who support him (inc. Israel, India, China, Syria &c). If you support war crimes in Ukraine, you also support those people.
If you support Ukraine oligarchs that fund Zelenskyy, you support looting and if you support the Ukrainian leadership, entirely in the hands of Jewish oligarchs and Israelis, you support the burning alive of ethnic Russians in Donbas. I can play devil's advocate here!
Again, I do not support incorporated members of fictional nation-state corporations, whether in Ukraine or the US. I support peace and humanitarian aid for those stuck in the middle, only if that aid is used for those purposes and those purposes only.
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)