CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo completely avoid Johns Hopkins study finding COVID lockdowns ineffective

submitted by [deleted] from foxnews.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Seems it will be impossible to discuss this with you, if that's your view of the history of virology.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

/u/socks. The history of virology is another subject entirely.

You seem to have plenty of information available.

Surely you can answer this basic yes or no question..

Are vaccines (independent of the history of virology) supposed to prevent diseases?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

yes - HELP prevent (not entirely prevent)

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

HELP prevent (not entirely prevent)

"HELP"..? Sounds like you're inferring that vaccines are intended to support NATURAL IMMUNITY.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

That's how they work

[–]Tom_Bombadil 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You've denied natural immunity for over a year.

Hypocrisy incarnate.

[–]Entropick 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."

  • Upton Sinclair

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

"Socks, is a shitbag shill!"

-Tom Bombadil

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

nope