you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ShalomEveryoneCommunist Party 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

We also let Jews migrate here and gave them equal citizenship.

Let!?!? LOL! Jews have been in America going back to the 1600s. If America let Jews migrate here, why is it then that the American government did not grant Anne Frank's family, along with other Jews during World War II asylum to migrate to America?

You're welcome.

For what!? lol

Shalom

✡️

[–]Tom_Bombadil 11 insightful - 5 fun11 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 5 fun -  (6 children)

why is it then that the American government did not grant Anne Frank's family, along with other Jews during World War II asylum to migrate to America?

I heard Anne Frank's diary was written with a ball point pen.

A pen that wasn't invented during the WW2 German occupation. Weird.

[–]ShalomEveryoneCommunist Party 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I heard Anne Frank's diary was written with a ball point pen.

You heard wrong, you were lied to by a holocaust denying white supremacist.

The origin of the “ballpoint myth” is the four-page report that the Federal Criminal Police Office (the Bundeskriminalamt or BKA) in Wiesbaden, which was published in 1980. In this investigation into the types of paper and ink used in the diary of Anne Frank it is stated that “ballpoint corrections” had been made on some loose sheets. The BKA’s task was to report on all the texts found among the diaries of Anne Frank, and therefore also on the annotations that were made in Anne’s manuscripts after the war.

In short: the “ballpoint myth” is easy to disprove. The careless wording of the BKA report from 1980 – a report that for the rest in no way challenges the authenticity of the diary – or at any rate its openness to several interpretations, has taken on a life of its own in extreme right-wing circles.

The “ballpoint myth” is based on the simple fact that, around 1960, two annotation sheets with ballpoint writing were inserted between the original pages. These texts were written by a graphological researcher, and are not included in any edition of the diary (apart from the Critical Edition, where photos of the annotation sheets are reproduced). In July 2006, the BKA found it necessary to state in a press release that the 1980 investigation cannot be used to call the authenticity of the diary into doubt.

A pen that wasn't invented during the WW2 German occupation. Weird.

Anne did not write her diary in a ballpoint pen.

Shalom

✡️

[–]Tom_Bombadil 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

Ok.

Can you explain why hard copy dictionaries and encyclopedias that are older than 1960 don't reference the WW2 Holocaust?

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist[S] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

And the Holocaust wasn't mainstream in movies and television until the 1970s and 1980s.

[–]ShalomEveryoneCommunist Party 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Whoa, just like that you're not going to defend the lie of Anne Frank's diary being written in ballpoint pen? You're not going to provide your own source that says her diary was written in a ballpoint pen?

Can you explain why hard copy dictionaries and encyclopedias that are older than 1960 don't reference the WW2 Holocaust?

There's nothing to explain, that's another white supremacist lie.

Shalom

✡️

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Can you explain why hard copy dictionaries and encyclopedias that are older than 1960 don't reference the WW2 Holocaust?

There's nothing to explain, that's another white supremacist lie.

This is easy to independently confirm.

Many consignment stores have used book sections.

It seems unlikely that every pre-60's dictionary and encyclopedia publishers overlooked significant historical events.

It wouldn't be surprising to see political biases represented in reference texts.

Failing to include any reference to the Holocaust is an entirely different matter.

Weird.