all 18 comments

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (24 children)

ratings went up, turns out people like the truth. made sense for ATT to make money

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

So it's good news. Yeah! Disinformation, authoritarianism and the general screwing over of the 99%! Awesome. Got to love AT&T.

[–]package 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

authoritarianism

Says the retard unironically as he spreads his ass for Biden and begs the government to further strip away his own rights and censor those that oppose him

[–]AXXA[M] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

/u/package please think of the Pyramid of Debate when you comment, and if you are going up or down it. Please don't drag discussion down on the Pyramid of Debate.

/s/SaidIt/comments/j1/the_saiditnet_terms_and_content_policy/

[–]package 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Tone Response - critical to the tone of another without attacking the substance of their argument

no u

[–]Zapped 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

How do you think Fox News would go if they had more competition? Would they lean further right or go back to center? What would the cable news landscape look like if there were and even number of left and right leaning networks. And please stop trying to convince me that the MSM doesn't lean left.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Until Reagan, there was an FCC law that required news companies to interview people who argued both sides of a political position, known as the Fairness Doctrine, 9here0(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_fairness_doctrine). It was required in the early 20th century because of the harm done to public political discourse by constant lies from one of the political parties. These lies changed public opinion dramatically at that time, and now they do it again. Fox News developed especially in the Reagan era as a far-right wing news company, and quickly thereafter changed their FCC identification from news to 'entertainment'. At that point they became ONLY a propaganda mouthpiece for the GOP, without any attempt to offer facts. All of their programming is opinion, not news, and thus the FCC designation has to be entertainment. Nonetheless there are many who read their propaganda as factual. OANN is Fox 2.0. Whereas Fox has been 'right-wing', OANN is extreme right-wing, and focuses entirely on disinformation. The problem is not just 'right' or 'left' politics, but the constant promotion of disinformation for political purposes. Many now believe that disinformation, as we can read on Saidit, and at websites listed in /s/ShitpostNews. Not that the MSM is wonderful. They're not. Think however of who benefits from the massive spread of disinformation, and why there are 100s of millions invested in it by Big Corp (not just AT&T). Why do they do it? Is AT&T trying to spread the TRUTH? Are they trying to manipulate people? Why? Look at their history and you'll see that they had to break up their country long ago because they owned almost all of the telephone services. They let go of the baby Bells. Since then, however, they've grown again to a massive size that would still break the anti-trust laws that got them split up in the first place. But the GOP have been in power and deregulation has allowed Facebook, Amazon, AT&T and others to be anti-competitive. In short, all of this leads to income inequality, makes the .01% quite rich, and screws the 99% in the process.

[–]Zapped 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Not what I asked.

[–][deleted]  (16 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

    Again - as indicated earlier - the "no, you" argument is juvenile. Make an effort.

    [–]American_ 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    If that's your only argument against t what they said, you already lost.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Is this a video game? Seems you also LOVE Big Corp authoritarianism.

    [–]American_ 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    And how did you come to this conclusion?

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Read...

    [–][deleted]  (10 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

      If this requires an explanation, then you are lying for the sake of extremist right-wing groups and the 1%, or you have mental difficulties, or both.

      [–][deleted]  (8 children)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

        Don't bother me if you're not interested in reading my responses. Leave me alone.

        [–][deleted]  (6 children)

        [deleted]

          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

          That's the problem. You didn't "check" anything that was relevant. Instead, you've focused on unrelated nonsense, like "Are you vaxxed?" Give it a break. You've received enough responses from me.