you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]RightousBob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Been on saidit for a week and literally everyone of your comments is a mainstream media/big pharma/CIA-DNC talking point. It's almost as if you are being paid to push an agenda. Either that or you are batshit crazy.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Do I correctly understand your claim?

You're saying that the fact that getting infected with a disease causes an immune reaction is batshit crazy or an agenda.

And this agenda is one of this mainstream media/big pharma/CIA-DNC coalition?

Is that right?

Because getting infected does cause an immune reaction. It's kind of the immune system's raison d'etre.

[–]RightousBob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Another gpt3 bot. Ay mate?

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're dreaming, mate. No AI has passed the Turing test yet. https://dataconomy.com/2021/03/which-ai-closest-passing-turing-test/

Is your position that the fact that "getting infected with a disease causes an immune reaction" is batshit crazy or an agenda?

If you don't stand by your position, that's fine. And I understand why you might want to change the subject rather than have to defend a position that isn't fundamentally reasonable. But if you do believe that there's something blatantly impossible about the immune system reacting to an infection, maybe you're interested in clarifying that a bit.

Because on the face of it the claim looks pretty stupid.