That's something which annoys me. Even if we make the hypothesis that no internatioanl intervention or mass fraud occured, the only parameters which changed during this election are the mail in ballots. By design, mail in ballot allow lower security for higher accessibility.

So in the unlikely event that everything in this election was as secures as all the others, this parameters alone make it less secure by design. So there shouldn't even be a debade about this. They chooses accessibility over security. Now, is it 1% less secure, 0.0001% less secure, there could be a debate about it, but it isn't more secure. There are no demonstrated parameters which could have make it more secure.