use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~2 users here now
It's All Politics
They actually did it. This is disgusting.
submitted 3 years ago by jet199 from imgur.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]antireddit 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun - 3 years ago (5 children)
It's been photoshopped obviously.
[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun - 3 years ago (4 children)
Share with us, what makes it obvious?
[–]madcow-5 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun - 3 years ago (3 children)
Also wondering. It doesn’t match common sense IMO, and the image is low quality potentially hiding give-aways, but anyone trying to sport graphic tech skills is full of shit.
I’ve worked with photoshop professionally for about 15 years. Including image editing jobs specifically. I’m not seeing give-aways.
[–]whistlepig 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
25 years here.. and I agree. the lighting is dead on.
but maybe it was gimped ;]
[–]jet199[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
At least the "nothing ever happens" crowd here isn't as bad as reddit. They only pipe up over their own personal hobby horses and not every single goddam post like the other place.
[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
I'm not seeing give-aways either. The focus, specular, and shading seem legit. That's where amateurs go wrong. If fake it's pro.
I still have my first PhotoShoped image from 1993. I scanned my girlfriend's photo, did some basic designs to it, and B&W laser printed it at the University Of Windsor. High-tech back then.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]antireddit 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun - (5 children)
[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun - (4 children)
[–]madcow-5 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun - (3 children)
[–]whistlepig 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun - (0 children)
[–]jet199[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun - (0 children)
[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)