An Hour After Joe Biden Is Sworn In, WHO Admits Their Testing Grossly Overstates Individuals Testing Positive for COVID

submitted by scrubking from thegatewaypundit.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FediNetizen 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

"Their" testing.

And also, this is old news. Very old.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Lies, again from this shitstain of a disinformation site.

And notice the Twitter link they've provided:

https://twitter.com/AndySwan/status/1351975650521993221

Reliable evidence should be provided in this case. These images and Twitter links obviously aren't informative.

And who are the 43 mentally-challenged numbnuts who've considered this post 'insightful'?

[–]FediNetizen 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Well, PCR testing can have a high false positive rate, because depending on the number of cycles, it can pick up trace amounts of the virus even when it's not active in their system. But we knew this even before COVID-19 was a thing, hence why I said it's old news.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I see. I hadn't known about those earlier tests. A major problem with the tests - in general - is that many of them are not appropriately conducted - with the swab in the right place for the right amount of time - and thus there are false negatives, which are nearly impossible to trace, unless one were to take the same test twice within a couple of days.

I should note that I took the text, which arrived by mail, and I returned 2 days later. There was no virus, but I can see how it would have been very easy for me to have taken the test incorrectly.