use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~1 user here now
It's All Politics
T-Mobile actively blocks incoming "thedonald.win" texts from Verizon.
submitted 3 years ago by Orangutan from streamable.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]bobbobbybob 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (4 children)
mate, try living in NZ. Our commie leader is PROUD that she's built us a china like internet firewall.
Coming to the world soon. Totalitarian globalists love control.
work arounds are to hack Dns over https into your network stack, use them to access tor services, although that's just saying "hi kikes, monitor me"
Even so, can't post to some sites, cloudflare seems to be working with our government to filter.
Citizen meshes seem like a viable strategy in non-rural areas, but then the 5G rollout puts a rouge AP killing death beam on every streetlamp. Not much you can do if they cook your hardware.
And the Sheeple are being distracted with 'net neutrality' memes, not understanding that's a different issue and any victory there is meaningless if the underlying censorship is not also dealt with. You understand the difference, right?
[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (3 children)
I think so, this is a Section 230 issue.
[–]hennaojichan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago* (2 children)
What's a Section 230 issue? Good to see you again, dude.
[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (1 child)
It's nice to see you too. Section 230 is what sets up the publisher vs. platform distinction for US law. Platforms don't have any liability for content created by their users, like a text message (as long as they act in good faith, yada yada).
[–]hennaojichan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
Thanks. There is no good faith here, for sure.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]bobbobbybob 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun - (4 children)
[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]hennaojichan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–]hennaojichan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)