#the sneaky corona virus.

submitted by mommysexsworker from self.politics

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

And this seems very different from what we're seeing with COVID-19.

It's the exact same, except worse this time.

  • The illness hasn't been scientifically proven to exist. No evidence of Koch's postulate confirmation.
  • Billions of dollars were paid (in advance for the Coco) for a vaccine (that didn't yet exist).
  • The "vaccine" has already been demonstrated to have extremely serious side-effects, and is therefore inherently unsafe.
  • The "vaccine" will require numerous doses to develop the alleged antibodies (the vaccine goal). The presence of anybodies has is not correlated to reduction in susceptibility to the illness (which is the lie to the public). This also demonstrates that the vaccines are ineffective.

Both cases involve vaccines that are both unsafe, and ineffective.

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

No evidence of Koch's postulate confirmation.

From Wikipedia, first paragraph:

These postulates were generated before modern concepts in microbial pathogenesis that cannot be examined using Koch's postulates, including viruses (which are obligate cellular parasites) and asymptomatic carriers.

Is Wikipedia wrong?

(No comment on the vaccine stuff. There are teams I expect to come out with a reliable, non-quack vaccine, but these things take time to do well, so we'd be arguing about different things to each other.)

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

The illness hasn't been scientifically proven to exist. No evidence of Koch's postulate confirmation.

I think we need to scientifically prove that this is a new illness.

The fact that this crucial evidence of existence isn't available is strong evidence of a hoax.

Then we can discuss the reasons why fake viruses can't pass Koch's postulate (which is essentially a root cause analysis of what is actually causing any given illness).

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I think we need to scientifically prove that this is a new illness.

The fact that this crucial evidence of existence isn't available is strong evidence of a hoax.

The gene sequence? It's expensive, but not out of reach if crowd-funded, to partially-sequence the SARS-CoV-2 genome yourself, which you can then compare against published genomes; if you get bits of the SARS-CoV-2 genome then it's SARS-CoV-2, but if you fail to find any of the published genome from somebody who's tested positive then something's up.

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Oh, neat. Some people did this with the vaccines. That's a follow-up (of sorts) to Reverse Engineering the source code of the BioNTech/Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine, but that project didn't compare the RNA to the actual vaccines to check that it was really the same.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

😮