you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

he's got that screen shot there showing it saying he was suspended but it's hard to read, can't tell how many days it says it's for

also maybe they reversed the suspension after he had complained and that thread got big

[–]VirgilGriff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

he's got that screen shot there showing it saying he was suspended but it's hard to read, can't tell how many days it says it's for

So you can click his user account but you can't see that he made that post 5 days before he made the BLM post?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

not sure what that is supposed to mean but maybe it took em a while to suspend him or maybe they reversed the suspension. do you think he photoshopped that and never got suspenced? could be.

[–]VirgilGriff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

maybe it took em a while to suspend him or maybe they reversed the suspension

He was suspended for something. He was unsuspended. He made the post the OP referred to. OP claimed he was suspended for that post, but it was actually a previous event that was finished before the post in question.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

isn't it still true. a suspension implies a finite thing. I am banned from reddit. Permanent. I can get a vpn and make a new name but feel no need now.

[–]VirgilGriff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You can't have an action taken against you for something you did in the future, as the OP claimed. Are you playing dumb?

[–]ExBootlicker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I see in the blurry screenshot that he got suspended for 'three days'

And then we can see from his posting history that he stopped posting for about 4 days after that point.

OP was unclear, but didn't specify which post got the guy suspended. actually he wrote 'posts' (plural) rather than 'post'.

I think its still important to know that Reddit's top level admins call citations with facts 'hate speech'. Whether it is this particular post or another post.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I can believe it got him banned, besides just trolling he wrote a long thing full of facts and proof. Reddit admis surely won't like that. It's not against any rules but that never stopped them before. I think they usually allow trolls that make conservatives look bad, just ban the intellectuals that prove their ideology wrong.