you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Socialism IS good. I have EXTENSIVELY reported on the VAST psy-op to confuse Americans with regard to these matters. You have been disinformed. You think the definition of socialism is the definition of COMMUNISM. Yes, a huge psyop. For about a century.

By the way, taxes don't pay for things. Taxes exist for one reason only: to keep the people down. Also, joke's on you, I have worked as an economist for over 20 years.

[–]proc0 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You can't have Socialism AND a free society. It's not possible. You are advocating for a Totalitarian nightmare. There is no conspiracy, there is just badly informed people who are emotional and think socialism will help the poor. Thinking you can take care of poor people is patronizing and will only help elect evil people that want to take advantage of the control. We're seeing this literally right now. Look at Oregon segregating black people already because of these socialist thinking bullshit.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Many of the early Socialists were in fact Anarchists and Libertarians. Here, have a read:

https://www.libertarianism.org/columns/man-paradox-pierre-joseph-proudhon

[–]proc0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No, that is why there are different words for each. Anarchism is orthogonal to both. Libertarians and socialist are almost opposing concepts. One is individual freedom the other is top down decision making and centralization of power.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No. Libertarianism and YOUR psy-op originating, communist-propaganda co-opted definition of the term are almost opposing concepts. Can't you see?