you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit[S] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

That's the way! Don't address any of the arguments. Attack the speaker! That's the lowest level of the Pyramid of Debate!

Berkeley is currently engaged in a furious effort to identify and purge the wrongthinker. We should know his identity in a few days when they fire him.

[–]whereswhat 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You are confused. I actually really like what was written.

What's wrong with asking why we believe this was a UCB professor?

[–]Chipit[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Address the arguments, not the arguer.

Do you have anything to say about George Floyd's pointing a gun at a pregnant woman's belly?

[–]whereswhat 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

You are either a low intelligence human or a moderately convincing bot.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I thought IQ was a fallacy?

Please address arguments. So, so many personal attacks on me. Because you can't make counter-arguments.

[–]whereswhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Re-read the thread. You are the only one arguing here.

[–]Tigerbitecrazy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I hate trying to have a dialogue with Chipit. He always thinks you're trying to argue....even when you are just trying to verify that the source is legitimate. He's the type of person who doesn't want to have a true dialogue, he wants to argue and won't concede until you adopt his viewpoint. He has a lot of good posts but he doesn't understand how to talk with people online...