use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~2 users here now
It's All Politics
Trump signs social media executive order
submitted 3 years ago by Tarrock from youtube.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]kokolokoNightcrawler 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (2 children)
Just give individuals the power to sue them for malpractice.
[–]DrStrangelove 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (1 child)
After a quick read, that's basically what the EO does. Sites that editorialize/censor/ban user generated content will no longer be afforded the liability protection offered under section 230 of the communications decency act, and can be sued for libel/defamation. To retain immunity, sites may not censor protected speech.
[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
To retain immunity, sites may not censor protected speech.
This is the key phrase.
Honestly I don't think it's that huge of a change, it's just codifying what's already in place: Websites that are "publishers" can get sued for libel/defamation, and websites that are just black boxes of information without reviewing the truth content of the information are immune.
Saidit is firmly in the latter category, so I think we're fine. (As long as the law isn't over-reaching and full of nasty loopholes, which is very possible)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]kokolokoNightcrawler 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]DrStrangelove 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)