all 6 comments

[–]FullBloodedWhiteMale 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

A few slavery facts: Of the 12M African blacks brought to the Americas, only 5% were brought to the US. The US had slaves for only 89 years (and I am not minimizing this crime by writing "only"), Muslims imported more black slaves to the Middle East and over a longer period than North Americans did, but there are few blacks in the region today. That is because Muslims frequently castrated slaves, and when Muslim owners impregnated black concubines, they often killed the babies. Arab slave traders castrated, without anesthetic, virtually all young African male slaves. Only 6 percent of Southerners owned slaves and half had five or fewer as slaves cost $23K in today's dollars. A skilled slave was $56,700. At that price, slave owners had an incentive to keep their slaves healthy. The majority of elderly ex-slaves interviewed in the 1930s did not find slavery that onerous, and many were nostalgic for the slave era. Africans—not whites—captured virtually every slave sold to the New World. Lynching is another historical practice used to shame whites. Over the entire period of lynching, 72.7 percent of victims were black, while almost all the rest were white. The number of lynchings peaked in 1892 at 230. Of that number, 161 were black. This means that in 2016, in Chicago alone, more blacks were killed by other blacks than were lynched in any year throughout the entire United States.

Sources: Gates, Henry Lewis, Jr., ‘Slavery by the Numbers,’ The Root, Feb. 12, 2014, http://www.theroot.com/slavery-by-the-numbers-1790874492 Crawford, Steven, ‘The Slave Family: A View from the Slave Narratives,’ 331, http://www.nber.org/chapters/c6967.pdf

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for the data.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

This means that in 2016, in Chicago alone, more blacks were killed by other blacks than were lynched in any year throughout the entire United States.

You can compare these statistics, but lynching someone based on their skin color is far different than black on black shootings due to poor education, drug violence and poverty.

For that matter you could compare Marrano Jews in South America enslaving indigenous peoples and murdering them if they didn't meet their quotas.

More indigenous people's in South America were killed by Maranos than blacks lynched by whites in the USA.

[–]FullBloodedWhiteMale 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Poor education: Schools in black, white, low income, and high income neighborhoods are "about" the same; $/student, class size, peforming arts, athletics, computers, labs...all "about the same. The difference in school performance data is more correlated with student performance than alleged school quality. Shootings drives poverty, not the other way around. Blacks and nonwhite Hispanics have truancy rates, drop out rates, fatherless family rates, CRIME rates, illegitimacy rates 5-10 times higher than those of whites and Asians.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Except for the fact that the most richest black neighborhood in the US has a higher iolvent criem rate than the poorest white neighborhood in the country. So, how then can shootings drive poverty. It seems that poverty drives violence when you average everything out.

illegitimacy races

Screw off with that bullcrap.

[–]FullBloodedWhiteMale 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That was a typo. Changed "races" to "rates".