use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~2 users here now
Astronomers Capture First Image of a Black Hole
submitted 5 years ago by PonderousIdo from cdn.eso.org
view the rest of the comments →
[–]HopeThatHalps 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (5 children)
black hole
[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago* (4 children)
The 2nd link and 1st are not a black hole, but is exact match to this picture of a so called black hole, exactly what NASA, 'never a straight answer' is showing you. So many people eating up this picture hole from @NASA I guess you can be shown anything on tv and you will believe it. Mass amounts of people would accept the earth being flat if TV told them it was flat. This is how easily conditioned americans are.
BUT, I still could be a black hole... I just need more proof.
[–]HopeThatHalps 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (3 children)
It's not exactly the same, just similar.
[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 5 years ago (2 children)
One of these is the Black Hole image released yesterday. The other three are cardiac PET scan images
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D34UnT4XoAA7n7V.jpg
[–]HopeThatHalps 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (1 child)
None of them are identical, they're merely alike. A thermal imager can easily create a similar image as well, it doesnt mean thats what happened. If someone wanted to create a blurry round circle is would not be difficult. This isn't the 1970's, we're not photographing plates tossed up in the air and pretending it's a UFO.
[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (0 children)
You could be right.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]HopeThatHalps 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]HopeThatHalps 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (2 children)
[–]HopeThatHalps 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)