you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]PRSanon 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

How would the upper floors falling ever take out the bottom ones? They're already holding the weight of the upper floors. Of course putting the weight in different places would screw stuff up, but it wouldn't result in a collapse that looks like the top of the building is practically in free fall.

What happened to WTC 7, which supposedly collapsed due to just a fucking fire?

Why are there humongous fires in skyscrapers that can burn away everything except the steel structural supports, yet we don't see anything like what happened to the twin towers or WTC 7, which both fell supposedly because of fire?

Why were media and officials so sure that it was going to fall? Fires never made buildings just fall before, and an airplane compared to such a huge building doesn't mean much.

Funny coincidence that Bush's little brother got a contract to handle security of the twin towers.

But, clearly, it can't be a conspiracy. They can't just go on TV and lie, can they?

[–]FediNetizen 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

How would the upper floors falling ever take out the bottom ones? They're already holding the weight of the upper floors.

How would jumping out of a 4th story window break my legs? They were holding my weight just fine before.

Seriously, the fact that you wrote the above statement in earnest believing that you were making a point shows that you lack a grasp of even basic physics.