you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Ah, you should have just started with that and saved my time.

“I don’t need to explain it”

I explained in more detail to Zapped and several others. I very specifically meant, why should I explain it to you? I don't see how you could be beneficial, I don't feel the need to justify my theories to you, and even bouncing the ideas off you would be bad because of your negativity. Some people add to this world, some people only take away. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–]package 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You don't need to explain it to me. It's just very amusing seeing schizos post "theories" that are literally just arbitrary components of diagrams they've seen before, act like it provides even the slightest amount of insight into anything, and then get defensive when questioned.

In your case specifically it appears you started out with an eye of providence, made a connection that it could maybe fit a stereotypical UFO in the shape, then decided the pupil needed something to do as well and so called it a "core" that "affects fundamental forces" in a completely arbitrary way that would let it fit in the shape you drew.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You don't need to explain it to me

You never wanted a good faith discussion about ufo propulsion, you just want to pick apart without hearing or understanding anything.

schizos post "theories

Small minds.... You should go back to reddit.