As you might've noticed, I talk a lot about the Jews in a quite negative manner, but I don't even necessarily hate the Jews as a whole, I just hate most of the Jewish elites because they're the current establishment and responsible for destroying the old white world and bringing about the progressive anti-white hellscape the world is today; ideally, I would want even the Jews to be eventually re-integrated into the broader white community, after we've taken out the malicious and anti-white ones through eugenics, given Jews are still genetically predominantly white.

It sounds like you are considerably less anti-Jewish than I am. Of course I define Jews as an ethnicity, not a race. Jewish religion and Jewish culture are a plague on any society that is stupid enough to let them in. They are fundamentally parasitic and will only harm the native culture in the long run. You miss this because you focus on genetics only. Religion and culture also matter, and in the case of Jews the problem is not genetics but only religion and culture.

I honestly don't see what motivates you to support E. Michael Jones and Varg Vikernes of all people. E. Michael Jones is a Catholic traditionalist, whereas you're not even Christian, and he's strongly against eugenics, whereas you support eugenics. Varg Vikernes is, like you said yourself, a white nationalist, whereas you think race is irrelevant, he (I assume) hates Jews on a biological level whereas you're Jewish, and I don't think he supports eugenics either.

These days almost everyone is 100% bad, so I am shocked whenever I see any good in anyone. I support whatever little goodness I find in anyone. In the case of E. Michael Jones, he supports religion and traditional values, which is good. And he actually supports eugenics in practice without being aware of it because traditional Christianity is fundamentally eugenic (as Edward Dutton explained). In the case of Varg, he supports traditional values and selecting for quality people (good whites, not degenerate whites) which is also effectively eugenic. Varg wants to live with people genetically similar to himself, and I have no problem with that. I don't think Varg hates other races, he just doesn't want to live with them. And that's fine with me since I have no plans to move to Europe.

Regarding eugenics, I have a somewhat unusual view. I don't trust micromanagement and I don't trust human authority to manage eugenics. I admire God's eugenics, otherwise known as evolution. It uses 2 simple selection criteria: survival and reproduction. Selection based on survival is fundamentally eugenic. Select based on reproduction (sexual selection) is variable and often dysgenic for humans (because of Fisherian selection). (For animals, the survival criteria overwhelms sexual selection so this isn't so much of an issue.) Religiously enforced monogamy removes most sexual selection which is why the best human gene pools always developed under this condition.

So I would prefer to take a high level approach like evolution does and just test for some kind of high level fitness. You can read my specific proposal here. Now I will consider how this compares to your selection criteria.

My ideal eugenics program would prohibit the following types of people from reproducing (not necessarily, but if necessary, through forced sterilization): Anyone with a low IQ (below 85-90), anyone with severe mental illness (schizophrenia, borderline, psychopathy, severe autism, etc.), anyone with serious heritable diseases, people who structurally use welfare despite having been offered incentives and opportunities to be productive, violent criminals and problematic drug addicts, malicious elites (both Jewish and non-Jewish), and anyone who's explicitly anti-white, anti-eugenics or is some other type of fanatical woke leftist.

People with low IQ, mental illness, or drug problems are unlikely to be able to play Go well. Welfare types, violent criminals, and other with poor self-discipline will not have the patience to develop Go skills. Leftists of various kinds (anti-white, anti-eugenics, etc.) are unlikely to learn religious scripture and generally wouldn't be interested in joining anyway. Malicious elites is a very complicated topic that I can't really cover here.

My ideal eugenics program would strongly encourage and incentivize the following types of people to have as many children as possible: People with a high IQ, people who are very mentally stable, people who are very socially skilled, men who have the ability to adequately provide for their wives and children, people who are very productive to society, people with special talents (being very creative, being the inventor of groundbreaking technology, being an architect who has designed wonderful buildings, being very good at sports etc.), people who strongly support eugenics, people who are pro-white, people who support healthy traditional family values, people who look attractive, people who are physically strong and healthy.

My selection criteria would select for high IQ, mental stability, self-discipline, and planning ability. This should correlate with being good providers and being productive. I don't select for (or against) social skills, being pro-white, attractiveness, or physical strength. Except for pro-white, sexual selection will naturally select for these things anyway. My criteria of being born of 2 parents in the group selects for traditional families.

I realize that my idea is a long shot, but so is any eugenics idea. Your version requires some kind of government support. My version only requires that a few (maybe 10) of the 8 billion people infesting this world see some merit in my idea.

When I talk about space travel, I'm thinking much more long term than that, assuming the current dominant system has long been destroyed by the time we get to send people to colonize other planets.

Of course I would support space travel then. All kinds of wonderful things come out of good societies.

The problem is that if whites manage to create a successful independent homeland outside of Jewish control, the Jewish elites will probably get the powerful countries they control (such as the US) to start wars against that white homeland. So in order for this to be effective, we'd have to put our efforts into destroying the current dominant system (ZOG) while simultaneously creating independent homelands.

I don't think most people understand what "the great reset" means. The power of the elite comes from their control over the dominant currencies. Right now they can print money to buy control of anything. But these dominant currencies are doomed because of debt and money printing. The elite are fully aware of this, so they are desperately trying to buy control over everything they can as quickly as possible before these currencies fail. This is why they are scrambling to use covid to completely remove all freedoms in the West. They are doing the same outside the West but to lesser extent. When the great reset comes (the dominant currencies fail), the West will resemble the old Soviet Union with the elite firmly in control of the military and police to control the public by force. But most countries outside the West will regain their freedom after the great reset. Without strong currencies, the countries controlled by the elite will be reluctant to invest in foreign wars. So at this point, it will be possible for good countries to arise outside of the West.