‘We will coup whoever we want’: Elon Musk sparks online riot with quip about overthrow of Bolivia’s Evo Morales

submitted by fschmidt from rt.com

sorted by:
new (suggested)
topinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

So you're ok with the holocaust then,

That was as real as the covidhoax is now. But given the years of unprovoked attacks on Germans by the jews, the Germans waited entirely too long to wake up and attempt to correct the situation. Look what the jews have done since then... The evilness of their tribe has been confirmed on countless occasions by the jews themselves.

I guess if you like having a king,

Would you prefer to be ruled by a king, or a cabal of evil puppeteers pulling the strings behind the scenes? The latter is what we have now, and we know their ethnicity.

As for kings, there have been benevolent kings who ruled their countries as if the people were their own family.

[–]proc0 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Hmm, what about all the other examples of mass murder by one dictator/king/etc? All hoaxes? Or all justified?

The problem is centralized power and authority, especially in institutions or entities that outlive a single individual. So you'll have one benevolent dude for a few decades but sure enough hundreds of evil people are secretely plotting how to take over, and so it becomes inevitable. Then it's a horror show every time, and that is why history has progressed in the direction it has progressed, less centralization of power because it's so risky.

Again, it's the position itself, and the dictators of the 20th century did something even more evil, which is take over democracies, which were meant as decentralization of power. They take over and not only abuse power, but are setting things up for the next evil guy, unless of course war happens.

A king or an evil cabal of puppeteers, is the same -- centralized power. We need to decentralize power as much as possible. What I think has happened is that power is no longer effectively decentralized by our institutions after *[[computers and]] the Internent... coincidentally arriving at the end of WW2. Before the Internet, communication was sloooww and therefore you could still decentralize authority to a great extent. After the Internet, nobody knows WTF is happening, and why people get so easily manipulated, and OF COURSE the bad actors have taken advantage of this, and the result is a regression and decrease back into centralized power.

I don't know where things need to go from here, but it's certainly not more centralized authority of any kind. We probably need to leverage the Internet and go FULL decentralized government, I mean FULL, no one in Washington anymore, just the People and the Constitution (which btw is a huge milestone for decentralizing power), a military that mostly protects, and the Internet.

*:correction, we got computers after WW2, setting things up for the Internet, but this affected all other forms of communication, the idea here is that the world started getting fully connected, and "globalists" I guess are trying to centralize this power.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Looks like I deleted the paragraph where I invoked both /u/fschmidt and our dear Uncle Ted, and pointed out how correct they are/were about the effects of technology on 'modern' society. Although the former seems to want to keep 'some' technologies. The internet in particular has made control through mass brainwashing easier than ever before, while increasing human separation from nature and reality.

Your dream about decentralized government is a nice one, but you'd first need to do something about the quality levels we're seeing in our species. This is where the fundamental problem lies. To paraphrase a SovCit meme, 'How can a man rule another man?'

The answer is to rule the 'stupids', and to promote their level of malfunction so you have more people to rule. There's no solution to this problem while the 90-99% willingly, and with assistance, bow down to their superiors. Perhaps the scheduled end of this catastrophe cycle within the next 30 years will take us back to tribal life that will go much slower next time.

[–]proc0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yeah, even I think that's a long shot that will take an unprecedent event of some kind. I was outlining the ideal solution, but the more likely scenario is a huge catastrophe. Hell, the mainstream culture is uplifiting a cult of chaos and destruction, that only want tear things down, and destroy... if they succeed, they'll destroy, if they fail, it's because they had to be destroyed. Either way it's not looking pretty.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Aside from the cause, it's looking pretty bleak for the next while. Not everyone believes in the earth catastrophe cycle that's 'theorized' to accompany the polar flip, but it's interesting that it's coinciding with human society going nuts. The 'cosmic disaster' playlist on that site explains the science, and where we are now. The poles had already been set adrift when the 1859 Carrington Event happened, and it made the north pole do an immediate 180 degree reversal of drift direction. If that happens again while our magnetic field is weak, it would wipe out electronics and electricity. There's your huge catastrophe, without needing the micronova and earth crust displacement.

Even if we don't get hit with a CME while our field is down, humans are trending towards an accelerating unraveling that needs no additional help. But there will be help, of course.