Trans-Identified Male Arrested After Threatening To Murder Children In Illinois Over Transphobic "Bullying"

submitted by xoenix from (reduxx.info)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ID10T 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

You really believe that BS? John Money was an abject failure. His theories disproven by his own sick and inhumane experiments. Modern gender ideology has no basis in science and gender "therapy" will be remembered by history the same as lobotomy.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

You really believe that BS?

It depends what BS you're talking about.

John Money was an abject failure.

The guy who contributed to the field in the mid-1960s?

Wouldn't a critique of current practises include some of the work done in the last 60 or so years?

Modern gender ideology has no basis in science

Great. I enjoy people who value science. Please link to the scientific papers that establish this.

and gender "therapy" will be remembered by history the same as lobotomy.

What makes you conclude that.

[–]ID10T 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Obviously you have no proof or else you would respond with some. You can read the many BBC articles about recent studies that show that gender ideology has no scientific basis. Oh hey, there's one linked in a comment below. Looks like you have some reading to do girl!

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Obviously you have no proof or else you would respond with some.

Proof of what?

You failed to back up the claim you made in the GGP comment:

Modern gender ideology has no basis in science

Great. I enjoy people who value science. Please link to the scientific papers that establish this.

[–]ID10T 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Ahahaha you have nothing. Just give it up. Your insane ideology is crashing. Everybody is sick of it. Obviously you cannot be anything other than what you are. How does a man even "feel like a woman"? It's like saying you feel like a frog. You are not a frog. You cannot know what a frog feels like. You can dye your skin green and sit on a toadstool but you will never be a frog. Ribbit ribbit to you sir

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Ahahaha you have nothing.

Tee hee hee.

What amusing people we are.

Just give it up. Your insane ideology is crashing

I'm not gathering what your point is. Are you able to state your position clearly?

You have claimed that "Modern gender ideology has no basis in science".

What is your scientific basis of that?

Or are we just making up claims about what has a basis in science and not referring to any science?

Because that comes across a pretty weak.

[–]ID10T 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Fetch me some proof boy! Your arguments are pathetic and weak. You have the rhetorical technique of a head of lettuce, the debating skills of a house fly. Where's the studies to support your silly nonesense? Go fetch them son! I summon you to bring forth the research to support your claims.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Fetch me some proof boy!

Proof of what?

Your arguments are pathetic and weak.

You have claimed that "Modern gender ideology has no basis in science". I take it from your repeated inability to provide any evidence of that science that you admit that you're mistaken about that.

I'll interpret and accept your comment as a retraction and humble apology.

[–]ID10T 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You cannot provide any proof of your point of view. I must simply conclude that yours are the delusional ravings of a lunatic. Sad.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You cannot say what my point of view is that you're demanding proof of.

But at least you agree that you cannot back up with any science your claim that you say was backed up by science. Delusional.

[–]xoenix[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Actually it would be you that needs to prove "gender identity" exists. Again, there is no proof.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Actually it would be you that needs to prove "gender identity" exists.

Which statement of mine do you claim requires a proof of the existence of "gender identity"?