Daily Mail publishes and then pulls down news story about Pfizer creating Covid mutations using lab monkeys

submitted by AXXA from archive.ph

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Pokeindafckingeye 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

One would imagine that news establishments would be bitting at the bit to find out if this is true after the last two years of a "pandemic" ...one would imagine

[–]Alienhunter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

One would imagine that news establishments love money above all else. And one does.

There's a couple things odd about this story. You can watch the video and it strikes me as very strange how this supposed Phizer executive would talk in such a blase off the cuff manner about this obviously sensitive topic to some undercover reporter. Says it's sensitive and says please don't tell anyone. I mean this guy is either a troll or utterly retarded. Which is why I'd be cautious at the moment before assuming this interview is real or if this guy actually works for Pfizer. Of course they're a huge corporation, so there's bound to be some utter dumbfucks in there, in which case this guy is getting let go I reckon.

But if I was a mainstream news organizations I'd be reaching out to Pfizer to confirm if this guy actually works for them or not before I went running the story.

[–]Alphix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's been confirmed time and again that this subhuman does work there.

[–]Alienhunter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Saying something over and over again doesn't actually make something true even if you believe it. Need to show hard evidence.

I'm willing to believe the guy works there, that shouldn't be terribly hard to prove decisively. Assuming that's true the question then becomes why is such an idiot mounting off about clearly sensitive things that he, by admission knows are sensitive in the video, to some undercover reporter who he ostensibly doesn't know? Is he an idiot? Is this some sort of bizzare troll?

[–]Alphix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The dude has been scrubbed off the Internet, even on the Wayback machine. Let's ask u/AXXA for the link, I'm pretty sure he has it.