you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Bonn1770 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Real guns are cheaper than prop guns on set, so they used a real cowboy revolver. The gun had to fire for a scene, and since it was a revolver there needed to be real bullets (the camera would pick up blanks as revolvers have an open end cylinder that is really obvious on camera). The prop gun person in charge was a nepotism hire (daughter of an old movie prop pro) with little experience. And Baldwin as a nogunz retard probably was flagging the crew like crazy with the pistol and had an negligent discharge as a result and killed a crew member.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Bonn1770 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    What with CGI? Again that costs more money. This was a low budget western and they were obviously cutting corners like crazy on set.

    Some industry professionals say there are a few reasons banning the use of guns on sets might not be practical for all productions, especially independent projects working with small budgets or tiny crews. In general, CGI adds costs to a production's budget, and adding visual effects to shots can take months.