Covid Seeding Re-seeding patterns

submitted by Trump_WG1WGA from xephula.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

This is ridiculous anti-science nonsense. It's not insightful or fun. It's simply false. Why not post something about the science of COVID19?

[–]tomatosplat 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The science is data and data interpretation. Scientists have said this virus is bullshit. Other scientists have said the virus is real, but not harmful to anybody who isn't already dying. Still another very small groul of scientists, who speak the loudest on TV, say you should do what they tell you unquestioningly.

If you would like to do that: feel free. Otherwise...

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

How is this remotely a reasonable argument? You could apply this logic to anything. (1) Anyone referring to COVID19 as 'bullshit' is not a scientist. (2) Anyone questioning is something is 'real' or not 'real' is not a scientist. (3) Science is not the problem here, nor is the truth. Why would you argue over either one? (4) There is a scientific assessment that is widely known. It's not too difficult to locate. Ask yourselft why you don't want to consider the facts.

[–]thefadd 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's a reasonable argument. Take your head out of your ass.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What makes it a reasonable argument?