you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It does mean this. An ex secret service agent forensics guy says so.

No, he said no evidence of it.

CBS news has to feel pretty confident to run the story, no? It makes the sitting president look bad.

Not really. Even the other one didn't have any evidence of criminal or unethical behaviour.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yep. We'll see how this plays out in court. Or maybe we won't.

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Now that the GOP had control of the house you'll see a large waste of resources investigating it. But it doesn't look like there's anything serious there.

I bet $2.50 they'll find the sweet fuck all that they uncovered with the Durham probe.