What SaidIt Considers Insightful

submitted by CompleteDoubterII from (i.imgur.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

See what I have to deal with? These people are insane.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (17 children)

These people are insane.

Says the Chinese transgender pedo.

I almost doubt you're a transgender.

You're probably a hermaphrodite

[–]FediNetizen 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

You two deserve each other.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

/s/Covers/comments/5uvy/lovers_in_a_dangerous_time_barenaked_ladies_bruce/

[–]Zahn 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

By far, my favorite ongoing Saidit gentlemanly disagreement, drama, catfight. And I almost missed this episode, re-run.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

Zahn the toothless sophist doesn't want you to see this.

[–]Zahn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Quit taking my vernacular ya shameless loquacious swindler. Use your other brain cell to figure out your own.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Back for more, eh?

The sophists are as old as ancient Greece, so you have no right to claim a monopoly on low-budget philosophy.

The sophists were the amoral in their philosophical musings and are the basic equivalent of modern corporate lawyers. Shameless scum bags.

The word is an accurate label, and you have earned your title.

You abruptly appeared in a chat to try to rescue your co-conspirator /s/Penelope from a savage beating.
I recall laughing out loud when i read your first question which ended with "no sophistry".

Honest thinkers wouldn't debase themselves with sophistry, and that was in the forefront of your mind, so I had you pegged.

Ah, good times.

[–]Zahn 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Honest thinkers wouldn't debase themselves with sophistry, and that was in the forefront of your mind, so I had you pegged.

You have provided no examples of sophistry (as usual) other than your own sophistry. It would follow then with your demonstration of sophistry that no honest thinker would debase themselves with implying being pegged, and that was at the forefront of your mind. By your logic, then it demonstrates you enjoy being pegged.

You're an absolute windbag. I'm neutral on your "problem" with Chipit, but your obsession with it and senseless attacks on anyone who variates from your hand woven narrative, makes your story circumspect to suspicion and reflection.

Tom the bloviater, pegs himself....again

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You have provided no examples of sophistry

You're apparently sensitive to the sophistry label. I wonder why that is. Put down the thesaurus (because you are trying too hard) and look in your own chat history for our first exchange. This will likely be a painful memory, but if you confront it then maybe you'll get over it.

This is boring, and I don't really care.

Bye. ;-)

[–]Zahn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I accept your surrender.

You always say I'm being a Sophist, but never present proof. As had been said before, I agree with you on a lot of levels, minus your white knighting Muslims, and more recently pit bulls, as well as pointlessly harassing members.

But, other than that I have no real qualms. So if you feel I'm using Sophistry to shill something, please present substance instead of your blustery slanderous opinion.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This is boring, and I don't really care.

[–]Chipit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I sure wish he'd quit stalking and harassing me. :( I've never had an internet stalker before, and I can see why people aren't fans.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I can't speak for him, but I'd stop bugging you if you stopped talking shit about the entire "Left" as if it were a unified force. Clearly it is not yet you continue to promote bullshit lies that it is making tribalist division and sewing discord instead of finding ways to legitimately resist the authentic enemy - the Zionists who puppet not only the "SJW commies" but also the NeoCons who you seem to be allied with.

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I still never see any meaningful resistance to these ideas on the left. Who on the left stands up in public? Yeah exactly.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You naively think it's actually up to the old-Left.

The MSM is controlled from above, not below.

The powers that be have squashed all publicity of legitimate challenging ideas to their control - both on the left and on the right.

Dynamic Silence - a method of closing off all access to the public media, and thus the larger culture, or only negative de-legitimization aspects of the unfavored individuals are reported, for people or organizations deemed to have an unacceptable point of view. Invented by Rabbi Feinberg in 1947.
/s/Terminology/comments/5rfp/dynamic_silence_a_method_of_closing_off_all/

Who on the right stands up in public? Yeah exactly.

All you get is SJWs and NeoCons - both serving Zionist agendas.

[–]Chipit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

See the crap I have to deal with? This was the man in a few threads ago calling anyone who disagreed with him a shill for big pharma. "Shill" is just a cheap, easy way of attempting to win an argument by refusing to engage with ideas.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Comedy.

I rarely bother to write to this Chipshit directly, because you are just writing/posting what is given to you.

I remain undefeated in each and every argument with Chipshit's tawdry script writers.