What SaidIt Considers Insightful

submitted by CompleteDoubterII from (i.imgur.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (31 children)

Who listens to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5CVsCnxyXg ? Anymore i mean.

Just take your head into this millenium. It can't be that hard.

[–]Chipit 17 insightful - 3 fun17 insightful - 2 fun18 insightful - 3 fun -  (30 children)

That's it? That's your reply? A non sequitur?

Well, I suppose it's all we're going to get from people who refuse to debate or argue. Like a boxer stepping into the ring with an MMA fighter, you are. You're right to refuse to argue. Facts and logic dissolve you like sunlight to a vampire.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (29 children)

Facts? Which one ? Tell me just one .

[–]Chipit 14 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 3 fun -  (28 children)

Arguing doesn't serve the leftist cause, because facts and logic are Enlightenment values. In modern times, no other indictment is more serious than that the Enlightenment endorsed slavery.

Despite proclaiming that "all men are created equal," there was widespread support for slavery, which made a mockery of Enlightenment aspirations of liberty. Enlightenment freedom only meant the freedom of the well-off to prey on the oppressed and downtrodden. Secondly, the notion of racial inferiority was a creation of Enlightenment thought.

Thus Enlightenment values only serve to reinforce injustice and racism. Debating and arguing (the master's tools) are Enlightenment values, thus engaging in them is pointless, as you yourself reinforce with your nonsensical replies. The master's tools will never dismantle the master's house. See: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02691728.2013.782585

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 6 fun5 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 6 fun -  (17 children)

I define . You only can cite. This is a serious difference.

Edit: Like OP, he has the ability to define, too.

[–]Chipit 15 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

You still haven't made any arguments, and you won't make any. I'm the MMA fighter, and you're the boxer. Don't even step in the ring. At this point you should start saying things about "lived experience trumps logical analysis" and calling me a racist.

Per Critical Race Theory, any concept invented or propagated by Enlightenment values is inherently "white" and inherently privileges white people. The free market? Racist! Free speech? Racist! Individual liberty? Racist! All of these things are racist because they were invented by white people, became popular in societies that were largely white, and led to white people rising to the top of "inequality."

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 7 fun3 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 7 fun -  (15 children)

You're wasting energy, which clearly shows, i won again.

[–]Chipit 17 insightful - 2 fun17 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

It's amusing that I can predict your responses, which are non sequitur again and again. Well, you won't argue and you can't. So what's left?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 7 fun3 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 7 fun -  (13 children)

You ever will rotate in the right direction? Instead of fighting a king made from water?

Edit: You lost already. Two times, asshat.

[–]Chipit 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Now, make another nonsensical reply that neither addresses the argument nor engages with it. Claim you won without arguing.

Do it now.

[–]TheJamesRocket 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Edit: You lost already. Two times, asshat.

No. No he did not.

He completely exposed the dishonest framework of far leftists like yourself. You can assert victory all day long, but it won't change the fact that you got your ass handed to you.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

when the judge are all liberal, a liberal always thinks they are a victor, even when they just bark at people.

[–]JasonCarswell 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (9 children)

Chipit is a shill liar who needs to understand what I already explained - that there are 2 "lefts" (the old-Left and the distracting insane SJW Corporate BLM Dems) and lumping them together is exactly what the Zionists want. The world is anything but tribalist binary, but that simplicity is appealing to simple minds.

[–]jamesK_3rd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

For all intents and purposes, when referencing democrats and Republicans the two lefts are the same.

The old left have already moved to the Republican party. That's why you now see the yards with Trump signs along side a local union/labor sign.

Democrats, and the SJW left are generally unrestrained. They are the same. It's another reason the American communist party

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They are NOT the same.

You should read what I already explained. The old-Left was about everything from anti-pollution and anti-war to unions and healthcare. They cared about people at large, whether you agreed with their ideas or not.

Antipollution was corrupted into the Climate Change Scam and somehow the corporate Dems are all for Moar War. They destroyed unions and won't even consider healthcare. The only socialism they support is big business bailouts and the largest socialist project on Earth - the US military. This is NOT the old-Left. This is the business corporate left and they've taken over everything.

The old-Left still exists and fights the Dems and SJW-Left. Call them 3 lefts if you want. The old-Left is distinct and separate, now more than ever.

If you continue to equate them like an idiot I'll have to call you out as a liar shill ever time I catch you. It's like calling all conservatives, Republicans, Alt-Right, Pinochet, and Nazis the same thing - and we know they are not.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

The old left doesn't exist in my world. Where are they?

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I and others frequently share old-Left content on SaidIt. For examples, read:

what I already explained

I also share Conservative, Right, Alt-Right, Green, Libertarian, and Anarchist/Voluntarist content too.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Maybe the old-Left are just part of the right now?

Could you provide something from the left that I would classify as left wing? What makes them left wing? Economics? Then I'm left wing lol

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

" Maybe the old-Left are just part of the right now? "

Most certainly not. However you can definitely say that many if not most of the old-Left reject the insane SJW Corporate BLM™ Dems' narrative. So that makes them part of the majority.

Read what I already explained and that thread.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I think it just comes down to using different labels to describe people then. Most of the ideas that you describe I would label right wing.