you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]whereswhat 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (23 children)

Specifically to your question, I'm saying it's very possible. I don't have evidence

Everything after this is irrelevant to my question.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (22 children)

But it's not. It supports the idea that it's possible.

And my answers to your questions about the premise of the meme.

[–]whereswhat 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (21 children)

If I were to say the moon has more mass than the sun because it's very possible, would you believe me?

You must be able to support your statements with facts or you just sound wonky. I agree with you that voting in this country is about as fair as a poop sandwich but how is that relevant?

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (20 children)

Lame. Everyone knows the Moon is hollow.

The entire system is rigged - not just voting, media, big oil, big agra, big pharma, banksters, etc etc etc for FULL SPECTRUM DOMINANCE. Everything they control is tainted. EVERYTHING. Keep watching the posts I keep sharing - it's all the "evidence" you seek. It's fundamental. The establishment is a machine designed to make people suffer in their servitude and enslavement.

[–]whereswhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

Memes are not evidence. You need to be more specific and substantive.

There is still quite a lot of good in the world. You should make just as much effort to identify the good as the bad.

Also, what's up with your response format? Why end this way every time?:

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

Don't be retarded.

I've only been making memes for the last few weeks. Look back over the last couple years.

The majority of people are well meaning. It's the kakistocracy ruling class that is the problem. I have made efforts to address alternatives and solutions, much more than just making this list. Doesn't mean I'm going to ignore the problems. As soon as I finish a couple CSS themes for SaidIt, I'm going to step back from SaidIt until September to finish my first draft to share - of the most important think I can possibly think of to help bring awareness not only to the problems but to the solutions too. When I come back in September I will not only share that and develop that project further, but I also intend to focus more on alternatives and solutions - rather than just sharing the bad news, as important as awareness is. This crisis is going to get worse and we'll all need more alternatives and solutions.

I don't see any thing like that. But I can make one.

[–]whereswhat 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

You must be a bot.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

How so?

[–]whereswhat 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

I cannot tell you how good it feels to see a reply without

-

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

That's very peculiar. I don't see them at all. You are the first person to ever mention it. I see a blank line there. Are you on your phone? This might be something that /u/magnora7 and /u/d3rr might like to know about. I'd also like to know if that's what other people see. I certainly didn't mean to be leave dots around. I find it much easier to read.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

[–]whereswhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The entire system is rigged - not just voting, media, big oil, big agra, big pharma, banksters, etc etc etc for FULL SPECTRUM DOMINANCE

I could not agree more with this sentiment (in case that was not clear before I took us on a tangent). However, I encourage you to recognize that it is best to withhold judgement in the absence of evidence.

If you believe that people who administer vaccines are somehow not exposed to the same dangers you suggest they impose on everyone else, you are committing a furtive logical fallacy (among others most likely). You are assuming they receive special treatment from the powers that be without proper evidence.

I care less about the point of view that you hold than I do the methods with which you present your arguments. Please see this guide to logical fallacies if you want to improve in this area. To further encourage you to read, I propose a fun challenge: can you identify specifically which logical fallacy I committed earlier on in this conversation?