use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~1 user here now
History
Legend: The Origin of Painting
submitted 6 months ago by Tom_Bombadil from self.history
view the rest of the comments →
[–]cunninglingus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 6 months ago* (1 child)
Major differences:
Those are temporary mirrors of Nature, not imprints
Experiments like the one discussed by Euclid merely involve a shiny plate inside a vessel that has a hole punched through the other end and a view area cut into the clay vessal above the shiny plate. That merely indicated that light travels in a straight line and the images were of course temporary.
Another temporary image was the look of one's face in a pool of water.
Temporary images also formed inside tents or caves that had a hole in their walls.
All of the above temporary images are somewhat blurry.
Pliny referred to a crisp illusion of nature, something that appeared to be three-dimensional, albeit artifice/unnatural. To him and others, a natural imprint of the mirror of nature was not possible, unless it was temporary.
[–]SheKnowsWhatAllKnow 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 6 months ago (0 children)
Nothing mortal is permanent.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]cunninglingus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]SheKnowsWhatAllKnow 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)