Can I run s/SEO? Its my day job so I have plenty of articles to post X)

submitted by Rastafoo from saidit.net

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (11 children)

Let's ping u/magnora7, u/d3rr and u/Axxa. They're the ones who can accomplish that. I'm for it, but I don't make those decisions.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (7 children)

It's tempting, but does anyone actually want to see SEO posts?

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

He's been here over two years, I say reward your loyal userbase, especially when it doesn't cost anything.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 6 fun -  (3 children)

You're right. This time.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

Except when you were right about Ethereum.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Hhaha thanks. I still want to use the shit, but as an investment it's fucked. I bought a banned book the other day with BTC. It was the first good thing that shit ever did for me.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

I'm always right is my family motto.

[–]Rastafoo[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

omg X)

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I wouldn't mind if there are not too many.

[–]AXXA 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

/u/Rastafoo that sub has been a problematic spam sub. We could try out keeping the spam settings set to all for links and self posts. That means you would have to regularly maintain the sub to approve non-spam submissions and add approved submitters. You would have to look at every new submission to determine if it was spam or not. If it was a legitimate non-spam article you would have to approve it and potentially add the submitter to the approved submitters. You'd have to make sure spam is removed and non-spam is approved. There's also existing spam that would have to be removed. Would you want to do all that?

[–]Rastafoo[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I don't think I'll add anyone to approved submitters, I'm fine approving things one by one. It gives me an excuse to login daily X)

[–]AXXA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

👍🏿