all 17 comments

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Some self-absorbed faggot. If race is a social construct and your skin color highly correlates with the distance from the equator, why don't two black parents in Sweden ever have a white baby? Surely if it's born far away from the equator it should be white!

[–]Fonched 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Exact same thing Bill Nye said when he tried to debunk racialism. And that's all he said believe it or not.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

So I sat through the 20min+ video because I'm an open minded chap. First impression? It's all typical Liberal "feel good" arguments we've heard since the 1960s Civil Rights Act was passed. However, where he becomes insufferable is around the 10 minute mark when he says the following:

"Biology is destiny"

It is. Even from a "non-racist" argument, traits like blue eyes, blond or red hair, green eyes, fair skin etc are all unique to a certain European continent, and forcing everyone to mix is admitting to seeing one group of humans disappear forever. He tries to play this off as saying "We're all Human, lol who cares?" while denying IQ differences. Many Black/White adoptions studies have already debunked claims that socio-economics makes us all the same. Further more, he also ignores that East Asians, just about everywhere, still do better in school than both Blacks & Whites.

"We are Brave to speak the truth, and the normies are cowards"

This is also fact. Look at 2017 ~ 2022, and pro-White Nationalism has been instantly scrubbed from any mainstream social media platform or even public debates. It's absolutely fair to say that the "racists" are the underdogs, since every major Corporation and Political Party ally themselves with pro-immigration or BLM movements.

"Diversity is Conflict"

Diversity in itself may not be the only reasons humans fight, but it's absolutely the worst when it comes to solving problems.

A country like Japan got nuked twice during WW2, yet the Japanese could still resolve their differences and rebuild an economic powerhouse of a nation.

In contrast, America freed its slave population since 1865 and even passed affirmative action laws many decades later, yet the country is still plagued by social unrest, looting and rioting. What's the solution to this? Giving them more money? They'll demand it's not enough and it's more rioting again. The only real solution is a national divorce, where Blacks, Whites, Hispanics & Asians separate the country or peacefully return to their own homelands.

Whites are being exploited

The richest countries on Earth are either White European or East Asian in origin. Since European countries experience high volumes of immigration from 3rd world poor ones, it's absolutely fair to say Europeans are being forced to share their success (and civilization) with those who either despise them or refuse to build their own.

"Things use to be so much."

Cheaper Housing, Guaranteed jobs after graduating High School, Local goods manufactured at home instead of being outsourced to China. Those were all better 50+ years ago before Globalism forced open the doors of White countries and sold them to the highest bidder.

"The Jews are to Blame"

Yes.

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jews-in-the-biden-administration

And also,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Revolution_of_1918%E2%80%931919

(all Jews on the Socialist side)

Memes

The only part where he's correct. People should double check their sources. But that's not enough to debunk or suggest that White replacement as a whole is not happening.

[–]Nasser[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

How do you respond to the muh native american argument?

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They were already at war/enslaving each other/replacing each other before Europeans did. And they were far more brutal at conquest.

https://www.science.org/content/article/feeding-gods-hundreds-skulls-reveal-massive-scale-human-sacrifice-aztec-capital

Europeans simply challenged them to the same war for land but won with better weapons. Nothing to be ashamed of.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's an argument in our favor. It means replacement is real.

[–]JapsDoEverythingRiteBlack Nationalist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Are you Japanese Jared?

[–]arainynightinskyrim 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The guys is a Jew. His video has been retweeted by a bunch of Goldberg's that work the adl and google.

[–]FoxySDTWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sean Last did a quick thread on him a while back.

https://twitter.com/Sean__Last/status/1551442991918862336

He straight up lies about a study that showed immigration is responsible for falling IQs in France.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I'm so sick and tired of these obnoxious Anglo bugmen. Not even Nietzsche could have envisioned such cretins.

[–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

He certainly envisioned the ape of Zarathustra.

http://4umi.com/nietzsche/zarathustra/51

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The menace of the underman.

[–]Erasmus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This was an excruciating video to drag myself through. Nearly every sentence in it was a lie. What a Gish gallop.

There's a real lack of sophistication in the way people like Mr. Beat fail to understand the different but related concepts of the Great Replacement, White genocide, and the concept of Replacism from which the Great Replacement is derived.

Replacism is perhaps best exemplified in the idea of the person, which originally meant "human being", but now has been extended to corporate personhood, animal personhood, and even abstract environmental entities like rivers and wild rice. When everything is a person, nothing is.

As Renaud Camus says:

The non-existence of races, like the non-existence of classes, is indispensable for the industrial production of l’homme remplaçable: replaceable man; exchangeable man; decultivated, decivilised, denationalised, and unrooted, such as needed by and for generalised exchange: of man with man, of man with woman, of people with people, of animals with things, of man with machines, with prosthesis and with objects — the post-human condition.

Replacism is a whole, a complete matter, a general conception of the world: if one does not understand that, one does not understand anything about what is going on: the Great Replacement. Replacism is just as present in huge chicken factories which produce chicken by the millions, which will never see grass or sky and are treated exactly as if they were things, as it is present in the Great Replacement, the ethnical and cultural substitution. It all amounts to a big thingification, if you’ll forgive my French, of the living."

This is what you have to deal with if you're going to make a video on "The Great Replacement". You have to deal with the philosophical concept of "replacism" and how it applies to people. Specifically, White people.

When you replace the idea of "White people" with the idea that anyone with any European ancestry at all is White, or even with the idea of "cultural Whiteness", that anyone can be White if they simply look at the world as White people do, this is naked replacism, the idea that one thing can be replaced by another thing and still be that original thing. If you say there are only less White people in the census because the definition of White people is changing, you're not debunking the idea of White genocide, you're engaging in it.

By making the argument, Mr. Beat is proving the very thing he says he is attempting to disprove.

But... the whole video is made of lies. It's a framework made of lies and supported by lies. Where do you even start? I feel sorry for all the kids who this is made for, earnestly watching this, and not even allowed to see a meaningful rebuttal to it on YouTube. It's their future that is being replaced.

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Even Shaun did not deal with the "replacism" factor directly in his video whereas Lauren Southern, who he responded to back in 2017, did.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"Irish/Italian "weren't" considered White"

This is a myth.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790


The Naturalization Act of 1790 (1 Stat. 103, enacted March 26, 1790) was a law of the United States Congress that set the first uniform rules for the granting of United States citizenship by naturalization. The law limited naturalization to "free White person(s) ... of good character", thus excluding Native Americans, indentured servants, slaves, free black people and later Asians, although free black people were allowed citizenship at the state level in a number of states.


Irish, and Italian immigrants were allowed to enter the U.S. and to become U.S. citizens in the 19th century and in the early 20th century (long before the 1965 immigration law). They were always considered to be White.

"But Whites replaced the natives"

Another bullshit argument.

Watch

https://www.bitchute.com/video/v0DQQl8zWEQE/

"Jared Taylor refutes the argument that whites do not have a right to the United States because they took the land from Indians. He points out that Indians slaughtered each other over land long before whites arrived, but no one says they had no right to defend territory just because they took it from someone else. All around the world, people live on land they took from others but--so long as they are not white--no one says they have no rights to them."

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm going to outline my thoughts and questions on this video:

  • Curious to see how mainstreamed "whiteness studies" has become at this point that everyone will say "x wasn't considered White" or "race was invented to divide us".
  • A counter to replacement theory I see lots is the idea that those who are 1/2, 1/4 or 3/4 White are not considered White, and if it did the White population numbers would be higher.
  • Beat says that the number of immigrants is not enough to significantly replace, or that they would not change the overall culture of everyone in the host country, though he does not source this claim.
  • Sean Last has published his arguments on the video on Twitter and has said he is interested in putting out a response video.
  • The rest of this video dismisses arguments just because they are wrongthink, and cherrypicks memes which have factual errors vs. the ones that are harder to debunk under his criteria.

I might as well say that Shaun (not Last)'s video is only less worse than this one. This one concludes it does not matter because "race is a social construct", while not touching on demographic statistics/possibilities.

[–]TrabWhite Nationalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Rae doesn't exist but White Privilege is a thing. Typical