you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Unz also hosted this defense of Pizzagate investigations

To reiterate a point that should be clear to the more astute reader, my goal in this series (part 1, part 2) has not been to defend “Pizzagate” as such. My goal has been to defend the people who want to investigate it against specific accusations levied against them by people who think Pizzagate has revealed no intriguing information at all—for a specific reason, which I will be honing in and focusing on much more directly in this closing entry.

Whereas the mainstream critics of Pizzagate would have you believe that the dividing line is between paranoid conspiracy theorist followers of “fake news” and level-headed people who follow trustworthy news sources and rely on cold, hard reason to determine the truth, my goal has been to show that—whatever is or is not happening with Pizzagate itself—this framing of the issue is arrogant, insulting, and the product of extremely narrow tunnel vision.

[–]Jacinda 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's the same article which I linked to earlier. Unz reposted it from Counter Currents.

Rightly so. As previously mentioned it's the most nuanced account I've seen. The fact the MSM is so unwilling to investigate speaks volumes in itself.

Edit: Thanks for posting. I had a browse of the comments threads which are always entertaining at Unz. Watching @RonW's sensible attempts to discredit the some wilder pizzagate will make you despair at the nature of on-line discourse (and realize how flimsy much of the evidence is).

On a more positive note Gregory Hood also has an article on the Q phenomena: