You didn't even interact with my arguments, because you're obviously too busy jerking off to your own talking points with the typical smug, anti-white snark added to it. Like I already said, the white people who do practice miscegenation are still a small minority, because they aren't literally forced to. No one is claiming white people are literally being forced to miscegenate, just that we're being bombarded with interracial propaganda (especially in commercials), which can't be denied.

Just a disclaimer: please don't call everyone who disagrees with you "anti-white". If I can go an entire discussion without calling you racist, then you should refrain from assuming my own politics. Now, white people are being bombarded with interracial propaganda? Instead of the more reasonable idea in which interracial couples exist and are apart of society? Bombard itself is also a strong word. Maybe travel to the Amish parts of the USA and ask the locals if they've seen any ads. If they say no, why not go live with them?

How is this in any way relevant? You're really pivoting like crazy. You were the one who brought up the "slave class" strawman crap, not me, and argued that the ideal slave class should be as dumb as possible, and that therefore if the elites wanted to create a "slave class" they'd import Australian Aboriginals instead of mestizos, pajeets and negroes. I merely pointed out how full of shit you are with that ridiculous bullshit argument. And obviously, if they're trying to create a "slave class", they almost certainly wouldn't be kept as literal slaves, just as very low wage wokers who will be kept calm by their Netflix after work, basically what is already happening but more extreme over a longer timespan.

It's not a strawman when alt-right circles entertain the idea race mixing only exists to create a more obedient ethnic group. Case and point: can you answer with a straight face you've never heard of Kalergi? And if the purpose was not to create the most docile race then what threshold even says mixing different people together makes them inferior? The examples of Africans or Indians run contradictory to this. At one point in history, Black Americans were murdered for attempting to even read a book. There was intense amount of brainwashing to believe God only created them so they could serve Europeans yet even after the disgusting amounts of torture and reckless murder, they always fought for their freedom. Indians are another group. They didn't want the British to rule over them and there was a constant attempt at resistance to get them out of their continent. I would argue that bringing these different races together is the absolute opposite of trying to subjugate them. Black people or Indians were brutally murdered for refusing to be slaves by subsets of people who taught they had to be genetically inferior, yet today they still refuse to ever go back in chains without a fight.

Because, obviously, of the white people who have anti-white biases, only a tiny minority actually deep down hates white people, and of that tiny minority, only a tiny minority are literal murderous sadistic psychotpaths who'd be willing to do disgusting shit like letting innocent white people burn alive or murdering white patients. Are you projecting something or what? But actually, it isn't even true that most white people have an anti-white bias. In the US, 55% of white people feel discriminated against for being white, and in most western nations the majority of population is opposed to immigration (yet their politicians don't give a shit).

How do you know all this information? White people are still voting for mass immigration in droves. Are we suppose to believe that Trudeau and Biden are somehow the worst scum, yet their power only exists because 50% of White population continue to approve their agenda with very little push back?

We mustn't nothing, you disgustig little freak. White people don't owe you anything. There's nothing wrong with us sticking up for our kind.

Who is the official spokesperson for White people? Or why does said voice of White people have to be Alt-Right? If we go by election numbers, Conservative or Liberal politicians who promote diversity are much bigger champions of white people than the 1% fringe parties that disagree? You can absolutely stick up for your kind but what I'm trying to tell you is, it already appears most White people have a stigma against far-right beliefs and are even repulsed at letting them dominate the national agenda. That's not an opinion, that's reality I'm trying to break to you now.

No, because unlike the elites that fuck with us, we don't intend to systematically replace the natives of colonized countries with white people, or pillage their economies, or publish constant propaganda about "black privilege" or "mestizo privilege", or put their women in commercials in relations with white men. It's more like, without our supervision, they're breeding like rabbits, living in extreme poverty and flooding our countries despite having recieved billions of development aid for decades, so we're gonna help them out but that also means we get to make their laws, restrict their procreation and make sure they stay the fuck away from our countries.

Your post is only 50% correct. Non-white countries have been invaded and had their governments replaced with dictators. The ones who did try to fight back where publicly humiliated or assassinated. I'm not extreme like Liberals who try and guilt this on all White people but try not to pin these other countries like they were given help without multiple strings attached. Even some countries that are recovering from poverty are still being affected by neo-colonial policies. Whether it's illegal over fishing off the coasts of Africa or the constant drone strikes on Middle Eastern families who did nothing wrong. It's not a surprise they find their ways into Western countries since their attempts at building their own have been sabotaged for centuries.