you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Asbestos is not dangerous unless it's in the air though. Once it's in paint or some other fireproofing on the inner steel and concrete columns, it is safe.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The problem was much of this asbestos was not up to code and HAD to be replaced. Also they stripped the fireproofing in many areas and it was on many different structures of the building. The buildings for many gentrificationists were an eye sore. There's a book by one Jewish gentrificationist called 'Rubble: The history of demolitions' an artist as well who was a member of the World Views residence program in the twin towers during, yes, you guessed it, when the E-tem and Gelatin art students, austrian Jews, were in the towers as well.

In his book, he tells you straight up that the towers were demolished. lol. Not only that but he lists all the demolition experts he knows, and I'm sure some of them must of played a role in the demolition.

The book is very pompous and show arrogance.

[–]asg101 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And yet billions are spent on retrofitting buildings with asbestos. Billions not needed for retrofitting the destroyed towers.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, when you insure them for total destruction and win billions from it and get the taxpayers to front the rest.