you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Mnemonic 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm not really a bible scholar, but isn't this one a highly disputed translation?

Anyway, it's been 1945 and these badboys were discovered:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nag_Hammadi_library

AND

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Exegesis_of_Philip_K._Dick

together are a better summation of Jesus's story and his teachings, not corrupted by the church, roman empire or money making evangelists and in a modern jacket.

[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's disputed by some, but it's the primary bible of Evangelicals, but they only make up a moderate to small percentage of Christians. https://www-images.christianitytoday.com/images/72807.jpg?h=407&w=530