So they are telling the unjabbed to take the jab because the jab works And telling the jabbed to get a booster because the jab doesn’t work All while telling everyone that the unjabbed are putting the jabbed in danger by not getting the jab that didn’t protect the jabbed. #science

submitted by Orangutan from (i.imgur.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

See the Nature link, which also mentions the 'industry' of mRNA vaccine research in the 2000s, which deserves scrutiny

you don't get to deny science and placate me at the same time. are all historical vaccines mRNA or not? You cannot ethically conflate mRNA with non-mRNA. yet you continue to do so. we're TWO FUCKING YEARS into this.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Not to continue this or to annoy you, but I don't see how I denied science, or placate anyone, or conflate mRNA with non-mRNA, or that nearly 2 years of 8.8 billion doses is the only significant reliable data, by contrast with mRNA research since the late 1990s.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Of course you don't, because then you'd have to lose a debate. 20k dead from Pfizer vax in VAERS was not worth it. New technologies are dangerous.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

this is how you lose a debate like a man: https://saidit.net/s/musicbywomen/comments/8p2e/janis_joplin_little_girl_blue_live_1969/w9xe