Go on google maps to Rothschild island then scroll down a bit and if you're zoomed in enough you'll see massive swathes of Antarctica edited out. What are they hiding?

submitted by letsgobish29 from (self.conspiracy)

It's such a poor editing job too, they just slap a square of some other piece of antarctica on it that doesn't fit at all with the landscape. So what are they hiding? The reason they give to the public is that they're military things. Well firstly there's no military pursuit in Antarctica, there's a ban on weapons testing there, and the public cannot get there. According to the official narrative, there's not much point in wasting resources there except small research stations and maybe the odd base to mark your territory.

Obscuring google maps only wards off the public. Other nations can just get their own satellite imagery, it's not stopping Russia or whomever from spotting their military installations. The blurred out spots in Antarctica are also way larger than anywhere else. It's not just a small base-sized square.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Rothschild+Island/@-70.3492727,-72.9832733,33738m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0xbb68aa5824b32959:0x6e3c749ef3cdf334!8m2!3d-69.6!4d-72.55

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Rothschild+Island/@-70.2724671,-74.1299713,33865m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0xbb68aa5824b32959:0x6e3c749ef3cdf334!8m2!3d-69.6!4d-72.55

all 29 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]raven9 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They are probably building some kind of underground facility for all the pedo-elites to run to when the real covid apocalypse begins. That would explain why so many billionaires are buying real estate in New Zealand just one hop away from Antarctica.

[–]Node 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

https://saidit.net/user/Lana3

https://saidit.net/s/conspiracy/comments/89dm/go_on_google_maps_to_rothschild_island_then/unwp

Maybe a dumb question, but how can this off-topic spam comment by Lana3 be saying it's [ removed ] while not appearing in the moderation log?

u/d3rr u/HibikiBlack u/Jesus

Okay, maybe it was just asking to be removed? Was highlighted in red, and saying 'removed'. Anyway, removed now.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I think it was me with a new admin tool. When I see the americans bot, I can remove all posts and comments with 1 click. I'll update it so that it also adds modlog entries. https://github.com/libertysoft3/saidit/issues/101

[–]Node 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

the americans bot

Ah, it was, wasn't it. "Americans say..." I saw one of those 'undocumented removed' comments the other day too. I haven't been a heavy user of the mod tools, so was a bit confused as to what exactly was happening with those highlighted comments with no entry.

Will be good practice to document the cause of an action. 👍

[–]Rob3122 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Working on the next way to kill people and profit off of it.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I have the next best idea for the New World Order: to make Soylent Green Money out of people!

[–]Smarterthanlastweek2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Troll or nuts. Some of the Google reviews give a giggle.

[–]letsgobish29[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

what do you mean troll? did you find the edited patches i was talking about? go down somewhat and left of where the rothschild marker thing is.

edit: actually i just had another look and basically the entire landscape around it has been edited and is clearly fake.

[–]Smarterthanlastweek2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's a patchwork image made of different satellite pictures. Nothing unusual.

[–]letsgobish29[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

LOL no it isn't. It's not even close to accurate. They are completely different areas pasted over the top of it.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Rothschild+Island/@-70.2935711,-73.5223908,40700m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0xbb68aa5824b32959:0x6e3c749ef3cdf334!8m2!3d-69.6!4d-72.55

This kind of thing? Looks like new (and more detailed) images of specific areas overlaid on a low quality original.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Rothschild+Island/@-75.2229236,122.1324986,2233127m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0xbb68aa5824b32959:0x6e3c749ef3cdf334!8m2!3d-69.6!4d-72.55

This blank area presents extremely blocky patterns when rapidly zoomed in or out, but fades back to blank in about .5 seconds. Probably just the infinite ice plane the flatters talk about.

[–]letsgobish29[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

These are the most obvious, and no matter how desperate you are to explain it away, there's no way you can:

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Rothschild+Island/@-70.3492727,-72.9832733,33738m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0xbb68aa5824b32959:0x6e3c749ef3cdf334!8m2!3d-69.6!4d-72.55

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Rothschild+Island/@-70.2724671,-74.1299713,33865m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0xbb68aa5824b32959:0x6e3c749ef3cdf334!8m2!3d-69.6!4d-72.55

As for the rest, if you look closely basically the whole thing is edited. You can try to claim it's all overlaid or some other such nonsense, but that sounds like an extremely weak excuse to me.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

You're obsessing. I wasn't "desperate to explain it away", I was guessing at a likely explanation.

There are people who know exactly why the map appears that way. Contact the map people at google and ask them what's going on. Then make a new post with their answer, or whatever you find when you fully research it.

[–]letsgobish29[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

fair dinkum bro. the maps only ever appear like that when they are hiding military installations. there are several such places in the world, although they only seem to edit or blur out important bases. plenty of other military bases are not blurred out. and you want me to contact the fat leftist fuck who works on google earth's customer service team? yeah i'm sure that will provide some elucidation lol

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

you want me to contact the fat leftist fuck who works on google earth's customer service team?

That's probably the or one place to start. I was thinking you would end up talking to real people who do the actual work. Or you'd talk to other satellite people.

There are people who know exactly why the map appears that way.

As I said. Those are the people you want to end up talking to. Then you will know, and once you post the answer to the riddle, we'll know too.

[–]letsgobish29[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

i'm sure they'll be very forthcoming

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Probably not the first few levels you go through. But their responses can give you clues to your next steps.

Why are there no satellite images of Antarctica?

Because of the location of Antarctica and because the rest of the year there isn't enough sunlight at the poles for the satellites to see the land, images can only be taken from December through March, the summer season.Sep 7, 2018

Hmmm. There have been several summers since the satellites have been in place.

Why do we not fly over Antarctica?

The polar regions have special navigation concerns in the form of the magnetic fields which permeate them. These can make it difficult for planes to navigate because the polar areas interfere with magnetic navigational tools.

Maybe.

https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/does-usgs-have-photographs-features-antarctica?qt-news_science_products=0#qt-news_science_products

They claim to have 'some' images.

[–]VirgilGriff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

The orbital inclination necessary to get good coverage at that latitude vs. the payoff of higher res imagery isn't worth it. Go to any other region at that latitude and zoom in and you also won't see the same meter-level resolution as you do on the rest of the maps. Smaller, higher-res segments are from scientific satellites that monitor regions of ice they're studying and shit.

This thread is retarded and you're grasping.

[–]letsgobish29[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

they're literally completely different images pasted on top that match nothing nearby, not different resolution. yeah man, the orbital inclination is too hard.. oh but wait how to explain the fact that some of the map isn't blurred out or edited.. oh right, well the science satellites, they defy the orbital inclination on those occasions! but they only give snippets to google earth for reasons. trust the science!

guess what you stupid fuck, it didn't used to be so blurry at all: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/weird-news/google-earth-antarctica-find-blurred-16879315

holy fuck people on this forum are stupid. you're like a bunch of redditors.. 'well ackshually this is the official explanation and i will never question it even though it's as clear as day that it's wrong with obvious logical holes'.

[–]VirgilGriff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Holy fuck you're retarded.

What you're calling blurred-out images are just regions that have lower resolution data available.

They appear to not match because you'll looking at a 1m resolution map placed next to a 100m resolution area, taken months or years apart.

[–]letsgobish29[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

nobody can click on the links I posted in the OP and say that with a straight face. stop wasting my time with your crap.

[–]VirgilGriff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

And yet I did. I'm telling you what it shows. Have you ever zoomed in on a map in a normal area and noticed the seams between two regions, obviously taken at different times and different resolutions? Satellites don't take a photo of the entire earth all at once. That doesn't mean there's a government conspiracy to cover something up. That should be the very last explanation you resort to, and it requires tons of other evidence. Not "I was fucking around on Google Maps and I just uncovered a massive conspiracy that goes all the way to the top. This is the big one, folks. This random fucking area in Antarctica is where it's all going down."

[–]letsgobish29[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

stop wasting my time with your bullshit. as i already said, they're not even close. it's not a corresponding image patched together, they're fucking completely diff areas and anybody can see that you idiot.

[–]VirgilGriff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I didn't say they were close.

Are you even reading what I'm writing?

Are you fucking retarded? Just tell me if you're retarded and I'll stop trying to treat you like a fully functioning adult, attempting to use logic and reason with you.

[–]skeeter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am retarded and I am running for prsendit.

Skeeter 2420

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Interesting pyramid, but the question of what the actual explanation is remains.

It's pretty unlikely to be the entrance to hollow earth, reveal the infinite ice plain, or show alien artifacts. Most likely is military and/or scientific ops of some sort. Maybe the pyramid is from the previous earth catastrophe cycle? Being so close to the next turnover would be a pretty awkward time to have evidence revealed.

It would help to research the orbital paths of the satellites used to do the imaging google uses, as well as all satellites that overfly that region. Do 'google satellites' overfly that area or not? And if they do, what does it cost to image a given area? Is there "no cost justification", or would it "cost little extra" to upload all that data, since it's already there?

Who else overflies the antarctic? What kinds of imaging do they do? Is it available online? Does it reveal useful data? Can I purchase custom imaging from satellite operators? These are some of the questions a researcher might pursue.

Hey, maybe this is one of those military ops where they're monitoring this post, and have already IDed both of us in real life. Oh shit, has your local fusion center gone on alert too?

[–]skeech 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

GOOGLE PEOPLE ARE FROM THE PLANET GOOGLE. TO SURVIVE, THEY MUST CONSUME HUMAN POOP.